as a pro-nuclear war voter, who do I choose?

[AzzarTheGod]

Tagging this woke thread and admiring the 5 star quality.

[maskedmelon]

Nuclear war would be awful. We need something like pestilence by which the competent can insulate themselves by some degree and not have to worry about the massive infrastructure losses to the prune.

[Daywolf]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Spyder73]

While Hilary is much more sociopathic and unstable, I do not believe she would hit the nuke button. Hilary is more of a “CIA shadow assassin” type than a “watch it all burn down” type. People who p!ss Hilary off end up getting heart attack gunned or crushed to death while working out - and she has been doing this for so long that I don’t think you can teach that old dawg any new tricks. Instead of nuking Russia she would be more likely to stage an assassination.

Trump on the other hand could wildly fly off the handle and issue to order to strike. He doesn’t have the mafia background like the Clintons and is therefore more likely to resort to shock and awe than stealth subtly.

So if you want the best chance of nuclear winter, Trump – if you want gestapo style assassinations and mysterious disappearances, vote High Reptilian ZOG Queen Hilary.

Both candidates will violate out civil rights to maximum extremes and leave the world in worse shape than when they started
running.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Spyder73 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

While Hilary is much more sociopathic and unstable, I do not believe she would hit the nuke button. Hilary is more of a “CIA shadow assassin” type than a “watch it all burn down” type. People who p!ss Hilary off end up getting heart attack gunned or crushed to death while working out - and she has been doing this for so long that I don’t think you can teach that old dawg any new tricks. Instead of nuking Russia she would be more likely to stage an assassination.

Trump on the other hand could wildly fly off the handle and issue to order to strike. He doesn’t have the mafia background like the Clintons and is therefore more likely to resort to shock and awe than stealth subtly.

So if you want the best chance of nuclear winter, Trump – if you want gestapo style assassinations and mysterious disappearances, vote High Reptilian ZOG Queen Hilary.

Both candidates will violate out civil rights to maximum extremes and leave the world in worse shape than when they started
running.

Good post, only 9 left as a fire giant ^^

[Spyder73]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Good post, only 9 left as a fire giant ^^

I will always be a Fire Giant

[Jarnauga]

Originally Posted by Spyder73 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

While Hilary is much more sociopathic and unstable, I do not believe she would hit the nuke button. Hilary is more of a “CIA shadow assassin” type than a “watch it all burn down” type. People who p!ss Hilary off end up getting heart attack gunned or crushed to death while working out - and she has been doing this for so long that I don’t think you can teach that old dawg any new tricks. Instead of nuking Russia she would be more likely to stage an assassination.

Trump on the other hand could wildly fly off the handle and issue to order to strike. He doesn’t have the mafia background like the Clintons and is therefore more likely to resort to shock and awe than stealth subtly.

So if you want the best chance of nuclear winter, Trump – if you want gestapo style assassinations and mysterious disappearances, vote High Reptilian ZOG Queen Hilary.

Both candidates will violate out civil rights to maximum extremes and leave the world in worse shape than when they started
running.

Indeed, choice is clear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSnVb4i_ZZ4

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Spyder73 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

While Hilary is much more sociopathic and unstable, I do not believe she would hit the nuke button.

Considering she personally upgraded Russia's first strike capabilities to modern tech, is HRC all we need worry about? And that was a nice hefty donation to the Clinton Foundation for giving them all that tech and building them their own version of silicon valley. Gee, with all those advanced war toys she (((gave))) them ($$$$$), you would think she would be more respectful to her friend Putin rather than calling him Hitler and threatening to go to war with his country, Russia. And you think Trump is unstable?!? hehehehehe. What HRC has been doing seems more in the realm of psychopathic tendencies, way beyond sociopath. I'd say death wish but she has transport to whisk her and her family away at a moments notice, like to cuba or someplace where the bomb's may not be falling.

Originally Posted by Jarnauga [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Indeed, choice is clear: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VSnVb4i_ZZ4

So where he gives his definite answer "nuclear weapons are a last resort" this is somehow different than US military doctrine the past 60yrs? or you just hated America all your life and criticizing us on the general fact?

[Nibblewitz]

I'm pretty sure the U.S. plan of deterrence - We don't want the world to have nukes, so let's make a shit ton, and I mean shit ton; build our entire industry around it, so that everyone else will be deterred from developing nuclear weapons. - is why everyone has sharpened everyone else's first strike capability.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Nibblewitz [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm pretty sure the U.S. plan of deterrence - We don't want the world to have nukes, so let's make a shit ton, and I mean shit ton; build our entire industry around it, so that everyone else will be deterred from developing nuclear weapons. - is why everyone has sharpened everyone else's first strike capability.

That's called military industrial complex. This is a tool of the globalists to make lots and lots of money regardless of global stability. In fact instability is exactly what is desired according to Kissinger, because if peace were to break out today, the globalists would have a snowflakes chance in hell of achieving a global government and systematic control over the world as headed by their technocratic elites.