Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Blue Community > Blue Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-30-2016, 04:15 PM
radda radda is offline
Fire Giant

radda's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 819
Default

I'm in for blue raiding to be pvp
__________________
Real Life Bard
twitch/kabijitol
P99'12 TAKP'15
Kittens Who Say Meow / Asgard / The Mystical Order / Forsaken / Aftermath
Sacrifice*P99G*
[] Tunare 2000+ Kabijito [] FippyDarkpaw TLP Radda []
  #2  
Old 06-29-2016, 12:15 PM
derpcake derpcake is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 1,434
Default

something as fragile and well balanced as the blue economy not be meddled with

not like its already a few 100% oversaturated, right

can totally see the 1200 manastones from the 90 red players left destroy the economy
  #3  
Old 06-29-2016, 01:26 PM
Tewaz Tewaz is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,229
Default

This is a great solution for nothing. Red players hate blue servers and would just quit. What is the point of standing in line for pixels? I'm down with this idea if all level 56-60's on blue are tagged discord.
  #4  
Old 06-29-2016, 01:45 PM
jtlightner jtlightner is offline
Orc


Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Midwest
Posts: 35
Default

Actually just wipe Red and let it restart fresh.

Make it a yearly wipe.
  #5  
Old 06-29-2016, 01:59 PM
fadetree fadetree is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,958
Default

The reason Red has low pop is because people don't want to play EQ PvP. End of story. There is no other reason, and there's no way to fix it. I personally don't care what happens to Red, but I say no to bringing characters over.
__________________
The Ancient Ranger
Awake again.
  #6  
Old 06-29-2016, 10:36 PM
Trungep99 Trungep99 is offline
Fire Giant

Trungep99's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: NJ USA
Posts: 680
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fadetree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The reason Red has low pop is because people don't want to play EQ PvP. End of story. There is no other reason, and there's no way to fix it. I personally don't care what happens to Red, but I say no to bringing characters over.
To fix it is my idea of having both servers merge and let people utilize priest of discord

People should be utilizing it more anyways but haven't been.
__________________
- Trunge - 60 SK <Aftermath>
  #7  
Old 06-30-2016, 09:25 AM
Loke Loke is offline
Fire Giant

Loke's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: AKANON PROBABLY
Posts: 781
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fadetree [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The reason Red has low pop is because people don't want to play EQ PvP. End of story.
I actually disagree. EQ PvP could be a lot of fun, the player base on red just ruins it. I leveled a cleric to 60 on red when I was bored last year and the entire time I was there I only saw cool group PvP once. The rest of the time it was epic rogs and t-staff monks hanging around popular zones looking to gank undergeared / lower level characters. We went to the hole once to get away from the popular zones and had a factioned wizard sit around and only attack us when we'd engage mobs. Same thing happened in chardok with another factioned character. Went to CoM once and there were multiple wizards sitting up on the catwalks nuking groups below.

Red sucks because their community is actively trying to destory itself. They would rather get some lulz from griefing someone than expand their community. Even after I decided to play the guild game hoping that would be more interesting, the people on that server just suck. I literally had some guy from the guild I app'd to ask me to help him gank my own exp group, and then get mad that I wouldn't. Sorry I didn't want to help some rando I just met kill the people I had been leveling with for multiple levels.

My point being, EQ PvP could be a lot of fun, the player base of red just ruined it for their short term ammusement.
  #8  
Old 06-30-2016, 09:36 AM
Rang Rang is offline
Sarnak


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 208
Default

Loke hit the nail on the head - wipe it clean
  #9  
Old 06-30-2016, 10:14 AM
EQBallzz EQBallzz is offline
Fire Giant

EQBallzz's Avatar

Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 507
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loke [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I actually disagree. EQ PvP could be a lot of fun, the player base on red just ruins it. I leveled a cleric to 60 on red when I was bored last year and the entire time I was there I only saw cool group PvP once. The rest of the time it was epic rogs and t-staff monks hanging around popular zones looking to gank undergeared / lower level characters. We went to the hole once to get away from the popular zones and had a factioned wizard sit around and only attack us when we'd engage mobs. Same thing happened in chardok with another factioned character. Went to CoM once and there were multiple wizards sitting up on the catwalks nuking groups below.

Red sucks because their community is actively trying to destory itself. They would rather get some lulz from griefing someone than expand their community. Even after I decided to play the guild game hoping that would be more interesting, the people on that server just suck. I literally had some guy from the guild I app'd to ask me to help him gank my own exp group, and then get mad that I wouldn't. Sorry I didn't want to help some rando I just met kill the people I had been leveling with for multiple levels.

My point being, EQ PvP could be a lot of fun, the player base of red just ruined it for their short term ammusement.
Well said but isn't that the case for 98% of PvP games? Every PvP game I have played usually results in either griefing or some form of zerging. It's always a rare thing when you have an evenly matched PvP event that isn't structured PvP like arenas or battlegrounds.

Open world PvP just blows because there are always too many people who put their own personal amusement above all else or the prevailing strategy is just to use overwhelming numbers so your opponent has no chance. In PvP winning > *.
__________________
Ballhaus - 35 Halfling Druid | Thees - 57 Iksar Monk | Siddartha - 51 DE Enchanter
Fizziz - 35 Gnome Mage | Sixxes 27 Iksar Necro
  #10  
Old 06-30-2016, 11:21 AM
myriverse myriverse is offline
Planar Protector

myriverse's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Swamp of N.O. Hope
Posts: 2,469
Default

It's not just the R99 player base. EQ PVP has always been unpopular. That's classic.
__________________
Gnawlunzs Phrogphry
Master Angler, Baker, Cadger, Drunk
"If you can't eat a frog, then eat two."
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:27 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.