![]() |
#21
|
|||
|
![]() Should just release Kunark with all the bugs, and when people whine.. tell them "Too fucking bad, you wanted it"
__________________
![]() it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable. | ||
|
#22
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
I'm a necro.. Two words: Skyfire. | |||
|
#23
|
|||
|
![]() Is that 2 words there, Bubbles?
__________________
![]() it's like you make the atomic bomb (server) and you don't want to let other countries (guilds) have nuclear secrets (under the radar information). it's gm's business and no one else's or else everyone gets nuked. letting Iran or North Korea beta test and keep the successful nukes, makes other countries uncomfortable. | ||
|
#24
|
|||
|
![]() I was actually thinking that the beta phases for Kunark probably won't get done like it should, so they should just release it in its current state and have people just report bugs per usual. It'll probably be wasting time to keep the seperate server.
That is, unless I can /change class, /change race, /change level, etc, on command, maybe even /summon item? That might be too much lol. | ||
|
#25
|
|||
|
![]() Why doesn't Project 99 just release Kunark officially without a beta? - then all if not most players will no doubt flock to the zones - in turn players will find bugs and report them, then Developers will know what to work on.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
#26
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
They have to at least have a solid version to start the release.
__________________
"I just want to remind everyone it's only 1 Cheeseburger per park resident."
Randy Cheeseburger - 53 Enchanter | |||
Last edited by Randy; 01-02-2011 at 07:44 AM..
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
![]() And you'd lose playerbase because of really annoying bugs.
__________________
Pyrocat the Protector of Vul
Proud member of The Safehouse since 2000 Pyrocat (60 TRL SHM) Orochi (60 IKS NEC) | ||
|
#28
|
|||
|
![]() I'd play on the Kunark beta if they gave non expendable sow pots, auto lvl 55 at least and if you die you die with your gear.
| ||
|
#29
|
|||
|
![]() I would play on kunark beta all day if,
1) my rog was current 2) there were people to group with 3) it were up! I would be horribly disappointed if they just released kunark now as is and tried fixxing it we went. It wouldn't be to to bad for the little bugs I just dont want to see a premature kunark like we saw a premature sky where guilds were getting to island 7 because it wasn't ready. I don't want to see people in vp early because of some stupid keybug or trak is weaker than hes supposed to be etc. P99 is the server for the Closest Classic experience possible, id rather wait another month or 2 and play proper kunark than a buggy kunark. | ||
|
#30
|
|||
|
![]() Everyone seems to have their own set of conditions for "I'd play-test the Beta IF...."
If this goes on like it does, Kunark won't be out within 3 months...maybe not for another year even, but the majority seem to enjoy repeating their daily routines instead of making the server progress.
__________________
I've been retired from P99-EQ & Uthgard-DAOC for quite a long while now, but if you ever seek advice with either one, don't hesitate to ask.
DAOC: Uthgard Revamp v2.0 (P99 thread for Hibernia) Uthgard v2.0 Getting Started DAOC Class Descriptions by Crith (for all 3 realms, with some comparisons to EQ classes) DAOC: Uthgard Revamp (old thread with some useful info) "Sometimes a Majority means, that most fools are on the same side" | ||
|
![]() |
|
|