Let's get back on topic off topic, and what this is about SJW Conspiracies.

[sOurDieSel]

The Liberal Terrorists are upping their attacks because they fear The Glorious Leader taking office and initiating the Kebab Removal Squad.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by RitualSacrifice [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Slow down, hoss.

The god emperor merely wants better background checks done before people IMMIGRATE LEGALLY.

I pledge my chainsword to the god emperor and his battle against the hordes of chaos.


[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[JurisDictum]

TBH

Nothing drove me more crazy in college than the super-privileged feminist or environmentalist that proceed to walk around campus and lecture the poorer kids what they should care about, or how privileged they are for being a man.

Most wealthy white women hate to admit that they are better off than almost any other group in the world (the exception being wealthy white men). Environmentalists are almost all -- make no mistake -- rich little pricks. It's just not normal for people to care about the environment when they have other problems. So its people without problems that take it up.

[JurisDictum]

You know, there are Law firms that make sure your parents are rich before hiring you...like, all the large ones in NY for example. It's because "outside resources" a person has are "attractive." Why hire a poor brilliant person when you can just hire a rich one who's dad owns a power company instead? You never know when that power company connection might come in handy after all.

Were aren't moving there, we are here. This is an Aristocracy.

[Nihilist_santa]

Originally Posted by RitualSacrifice [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Daily reminder that fucking with your hormones will literally cause cancer

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

*may

5% cancer risk vs suicide

less risk overall because I care about my body, don't smoke, don't binge on alcohol. live a healthy conscious lifestyle

decreased or negated risk of other forms of cancer such as prostate or testicular.

but none of that has anything to do with sjws tolerance or respect for the constitution and freedom or liberty

so why are you posting about it when your opinion wasnted solicited. my response was though.

don't fire shots at ppl randomly if you don't want to hear what they have to say in kind

Don't you have a Tranny guild to spam.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

healthy conscious lifestyle

Cross-dressing and meeting random people in public bathrooms for "dates" is considered "healthy" now? O.o

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by maerilith [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't own any button up shirts or tux's though. So not a cross dresser.

Well that is totally inverted reasoning...
Dude gets injections, declares himself a gal, regards cross-dressing putting on mens clothing. I couldn't have thought that one up myself.

Truth is human "transgender" just doesn't really exist, only in the mind, not in science. All you are doing to yourself only confuses your true nature of which you can never fully escape no matter how hard you try. You only hurt yourself, and as a human being, thats sad to see. You have the freedom to do so, but it leads to a bad end statistically. If only statistics were the only downside though.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Daywolf [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

All you are doing to yourself only confuses your true nature of which you can never fully escape no matter how hard you try. You only hurt yourself, and as a human being, thats sad to see. You have the freedom to do so, but it leads to a bad end statistically. If only statistics were the only downside though.

Truth. And medical experts perpetuating the delusion is a disservice to afflicted individuals. The only rational choices are to acknowledge and embrace a disjointed existence and associated consequences, or acknowledge and embrace the other disjointed existence and associated consequences. Pretending either set of consequences isn't there doesn't make it so.

[JurisDictum]

Originally Posted by RitualSacrifice [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It has nothing to do with being white or male, juris.

Straight white males have the least rights and privilege of any group in america, and that is undisputable fact.

I would say that's pretty disputable.

I'm not talking about formal legal rights. Saying "wealthy white men" don't have privilege is fairly incoherent.