Libertarian Party, why do you FAIL?

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by Scrapiron [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ivory, it looks like you are confusing rules with laws.

Lol.....learn....words...mean.....

rule
ro͞ol/Submit
noun
plural noun: rules; noun: Rules
1.
one of a set of explicit or understood regulations or principles governing conduct within a particular activity or sphere.


law
lô/Submit
noun
1.
the system of rules that a particular country or community recognizes as regulating the actions of its members and may enforce by the imposition of penalties.

[Raev]

Originally Posted by Ivory [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

more marxist idiocy

You claimed that without society without government is impossible. That without the beneficent hand of government hovering over us we would be unable to form any sort of collective action and would be reduced to living in trees murdering each other.

I proved you wrong by counterexample.

That will be all.

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Guess you've never heard of an executive order.

Have....you? :3

Executive order isn't just "hay I gonna make new laws now k?"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_order

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Ivory [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Also had child labor and no worker safety laws and slavery....

The good ol days! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you don't think those both still exist your not paying enough attention.

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You claimed that without society without government is impossible. That without the beneficent hand of government hovering over us we would be unable to form any sort of collective action and would be reduced to living in trees murdering each other..

Fun fact....did you know you can have different forms of government? -gasp gasp-

Including large councils made up of populations!!! In small groups it works, but fitting 300 million peple into a room is hard.

Dat is why we elect representatives to go into a room instade herpa derpa. So we can use smallar ruumes.

[Pokesan]

if by proved wrong he means deliberately misinterpreted for the sake of being contrary

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by Blitzers [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you don't think both of those still exist your not paying enough attention.

Totes. Really, if you think about it, modern day is way worse than 1830.... things were so much simpler back then!!! I mean, I watched little house on the prairie and everyone seemed really happy!!! I get my view of history from TV too.

[Raev]

It's like you are incapable of reading anything I write. Again, you claimed that a large, active government is the only form of society. I showed you a counterexample proving you wrong. What exactly is unclear about that to you?

[Ivory]

Originally Posted by Raev [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's like you are incapable of reading anything I write. Again, you claimed that a large, active government is the only form of society. I showed you a counterexample proving you wrong. What exactly is unclear about that to you?

Did you really? :P Your "I proved you wrong, we don't need no government" was the US with a population of 13 million lol.....

You got no idea what you are talking about haha. Your idea of the world in 1830 is by watching old westerns on TV :P

[Nihilist_santa]

Cantwell does a pretty good job of explaining the existential crisis at the heart of libertarianism and why it fails.


https://christophercantwell.com/2015...-are-hopeless/