P99 should Go Up to Frogloks

[myriverse]

It's a sin to do anything with a frog except eat it.

[Odann]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd love a Halfling ranger or a dwarf berserker even without those expansions.

You think you do...









































































But you don't.

[Swish]

#RIPnostalrius

[snergle]

Originally Posted by Jimjam [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'd love a Halfling ranger or a dwarf berserker even without those expansions. Not Classic though.

I would love a dwf berserker as well but if you played zerks you know it would be a huge pita to release them. They came out when they swapped melee to using endurance for mana and their class revolved around it. If you kept it classic they would have their discs, be on the monk triple attack table and would have frenzy. They would have no axe summon, no reduce agro, no snare, no stun, and no volley. So they would be a warrior with a fancy kick, with warrior agro and between monk and rog dps in chain.

With all that said I would make a zerk the day the released them though. If I made my own p99 style server I would have bst and zerks to see what it would of been like if they were in from the start.

I plan to rp a dwf war as a zerk except wear plate.

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by jcr4990 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Frogs were pretty cool. However it was always a pet peeve of mine that they didn't use guk frog models. Would've been so much cooler to have those as playable race.

This! Additionally, iksar should have used the CT lizardman models.

[leftharted]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This! Additionally, iksar should have used the CT lizardman models.

Id love if Iksar were swapped with CT lizardmen models =P

im not up to speed on my EQ lore; should they have been the lizardman models??? or was their some sort of event etc that explains the iksar's differences?? curious.

+1 for daydreaming of froglock/kerra playable races that use old-world models without adding nexus/PoP... assuming we can add a 'Sit' animation somehow... cuz I doubt they have one. heh.

[myriverse]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This! Additionally, iksar should have used the CT lizardman models.

Bah! Those lizards are the feeble inbred dregs left behind, like those disgusting Kerrans are to the Vah Shir.

[Baler]

Stay in Velious!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a1AHwlHri_o

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by Haliyen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Anyone agree?

Translation: I don't like the fact that this server is different than the other 50 servers I can choose from that already cater to what I want. You must homogenize with my opinion of what EQ should be because I don't feel safe with the existence of P99 and it's heresy of nonconformity to the established system. Yes, most of those non-p99 servers are empty, but this server has a population imo for no particular reason and would greatly benefit by having no other choice once this server is brought into line with what is expected for EQ. I just don't see why anyone would want something different than all the rest
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Zekayy]

Nothing passed velious is classic in luclin you have Mounts the Bazzar The bazzar got rid of the classic EC Tunnel Trading also going passed velious would make all the classic zones dead idk why you all want it passed velious go play live if you want horses and aas and other shit that is not classic everquest