Kasich 2016

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like my hockey players Canadian and my presidents American. That's how dad did it. That's how America does it.

PS: Ted Cruz looks like a cross between my landscaper and Jared from Subway. In case I'm being too vague (I realize Cruz supporters are slow) I'm saying he looks like a Hispanic pedophile.

Guess Kasich is Don Juan right?

Low information voters have ruined America. Thanks dousche

[Daywolf]

Well we need an asshole to get in there and start ripping the guts out of this 0bama shit such as 0bamacare to name the biggest whale. No more of this apologetic defeatist squeaky-mouse castrated attitude in fear of insulting someones feelings. Let the rest pack their bags and go back to freakin Lilliput where they belong.
RINOs
Globalists
Libtards
Wimps
The establishment

[maskedmelon]

I don't have any issues with assholes. The problem is that many people do and that renders Cruz unelectable. His particular brand of assholery (pious arrogance) is also particularly worrisome in a leader. Put Cruz on the SCOTUS where he can do far more good and need not worry about electability.

[Lune]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Put Cruz on the SCOTUS

oh god lol

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[maskedmelon]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

oh god lol

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What do you think he would do that you disagree with?


Nice cartoon btw.

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have any issues with assholes. The problem is that many people do and that renders Cruz unelectable. His particular brand of assholery (pious arrogance) is also particularly worrisome in a leader. Put Cruz on the SCOTUS where he can do far more good and need not worry about electability.

Very logical,

No one likes him

He can't get elected

Hey Senate, approve this guy you HATE for Supreme Court?

WTF... Your not making any sense.

Cruz's enemies are not the people voting for Predident his enemies are in the Senate, and after the last 20 - 40 years of BAD DEALS if Ted just stripped the executive branch of power and appointed real conservatives to SCOTUS that would be a win. Quit acting like "getting things done" is a good thing, all it's led to is less and less Liberty.

[maskedmelon]

He'd have no problem getting confirmed. He is eminently qualified. He's just an asshole who can't work with people or win an election. His people problems aren't just with 'the establishment'. He's hated because he's rude and has no respect whatsoever for his fellow man. Even Trump is demonstrates more respect for others than Cruz.

[Blitzers]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He'd have no problem getting confirmed. He is eminently qualified. He's just an asshole who can't work with people or win an election. His people problems aren't just with 'the establishment'. He's hated because he's rude and has no respect whatsoever for his fellow man. Even Trump is demonstrates more respect for others than Cruz.

yeah you have no clue about Cruz and his dissenters. All I can say is your wrong and quit repeating Fox News talking points it's beneath you. Too funny Cruz, rude and disrespectful to his fellow man, completely void and incorrect description of Cruz and lacking of any knowledge of the man. No reason to continue this conversation since false narratives and talking points is your only argument.

[Daywolf]

Originally Posted by maskedmelon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't have any issues with assholes. The problem is that many people do and that renders Cruz unelectable. His particular brand of assholery (pious arrogance) is also particularly worrisome in a leader. Put Cruz on the SCOTUS where he can do far more good and need not worry about electability.

Well my post seems to be pointing away from rather than pointing to. In light of the topic of this thread; away from Kasich is a given, obviously. But the contrast is there, pointing to, but in general and not specifically at any particular nominee.

But in the matter of pointing to, this doesn't seem to exclude Donald in that observation, and wouldn't seem to fall into my strikeout list. But you know my standing in the matter, you're an observant person in these forums. I am fond of both of them for the purpose at hand, both assholes hah, and a purpose that needs to be addressed as no other. That's not Kasich, Rubio or even a possible hidden latecomer such as Romney. Lilliputians I say, certainly so, and a likely devastating hit to a party in revolt as it stands, as anyway my observation from a fringe party.

But I see two possibilities, possibly even a ticket in that as a likely outcome the way things are going. And to me, seems like anything else will likely be the same defeated outcome, predetermined out of defeatism as has been the norm at least in national elections out of the RNC. But I leave you something to gawk at, maybe a little outside of your projections Don and Ted's most excellent adventures. I don't agree with all parts of that article though, such as scenario #2 with Rubio having any chance of taking Idaho haha! But in general, the writer has a good grasp of things.
viva la revolucion!

[Lojik]

Watching the debates, it reminded me why I dislike almost every politician again. They're either uninformed, just plain stupid, or preoccupied with their competition. On the surface I'd agree that Kasich seemed the most reasonable, but I also agree with Lune that he is probably just full of shit.

One of my main issues with mainstream politics is that (at least from the numbers I saw) most americans want the us to become less involved in the affairs of other countries. However, in the US there exists a very vocal minority to this idea, that will label you almost traitorous if you take this position. I find this especially true with older Americans regardless of political affiliation, and they'll simply refuse to acknowledge any position you might take as long as it "betrays all we worked for on liberating the world in WW2." Even though the largest percentage of our discretionary spending goes to defense, there won't be an elected president of either party willing to actually limit defense spending. There's too many powerful factions still feeding off the victory propaganda of ww2, and too vocal a group of people unable to see past it.