Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:52 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Patriam1066 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
LOL

and you missed my point completely about the feigned outrage. I'm not gonna give a long winded answer BUT basically here it is:
1. African lion killer called redneck and white trash
2. Mexican illegal called beaner, god damn Mexican, they took er jobs, etc

I don't buy the outrage because within 30 minutes it goes from being about poaching and murder to "kill whitey" or a Mexican witch hunt by Ann Coulter. Case and point:
http://youtu.be/VYlYk9gB8ZA

EVERY issue in this country somehow becomes someone defaming someone else based on race, gender, etc. it's getting old
I just wanted to get some topics to roid about and your quote was perfect cus it had a bunch of em in once place.

hey dude, you do reliase tho that if 99% of the people are outraged 1% is saying kill whitey over it.. so you are being naive if you think that you should be outraged that people are outraged over something that is legit wrong.

Public outrage will make it an issue, it will attract more attention and its a good thing. Better than just ignoring it completely.

Admit it, you are more outraged about the outrage than anything else the same way some teenager wearing eye shadow thinks his brothers are idiots for watching sports on TV.
  #2  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:28 PM
indiscriminate_hater indiscriminate_hater is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 1,758
Default

Wait so what's the punchline?
  #3  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:30 PM
Big_Japan Big_Japan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: shrapnel city
Posts: 1,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
1. Immigration. No a single person does not define anything. I am pro immigration, I think its stupid to draw lines around countries and say one person can enter and another cant. I'm not in immigration law and I never will be, that is my opinion. I think anyone who is upset about immigration in the USA generally is going to be retarded.

2. lets ban guns. Fuck yea lets do it! I hate guns, i think people that LOVE them tend to be dumber than people that dont. They like big noises and boom booms.. their arguments are always anti intellectual. In general you'll find 2 types of gun supporters, ones that say LIBTARDS and others that try to sound like they are smart and are a 'regular middle of the road american' that say, 'I dont like the NRA but guns dont kill people people do, we should be working on mental health. I vote republican and free healthcare is anti american!' Please tell me you notice being anti free health care and anti gun control because you think its a mental health issue is being a huge asshole for no reason.
These two opinions alone are enough for me to state unequivocally that you should not waste anyone's time or bandwidth talking politics. Just stop embarrassing yourself and go back to Great Britain, please.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The point of gun ownership isn't fun, or self-defense from groids (although the right to have such is absolutely vital), it's inspiring the fear in state masters that comprises the most vital, if unspoken, "check and balance" of the American system. If you're truly oblivious to this, or subscribe to an opinion you heard a standup comedian on Tel-Aviv Central say like "dey got tanks and a-10 warthogs and nukes doe!!!", please just close your mouth.

The point of restrictive immigration isn't racism, whatever retarded argument you heard the "conservatives" (really co-opted neo-liberal totalitarians) making on talmudvision. It's about economics. It's about not diluting the economic value of the American peon. Do you really think it's "stupid" to try and avoid diluting your worth to that of a Chinese factory slave, or do you in fact not do any thinking whatsoever, and instead parrot what you heard on the picture box?
  #4  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:36 PM
Big_Japan Big_Japan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: shrapnel city
Posts: 1,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Just stop embarrassing yourself and go back to Great Britain, please.
before you take that as some kind of xenophobic nonsequitur: I'm under the impression you are from Britain, cant remember for sure
  #5  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:41 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The point of gun ownership isn't fun, or self-defense from groids (although the right to have such is absolutely vital), it's inspiring the fear in state masters that comprises the most vital, if unspoken, "check and balance" of the American system. If you're truly oblivious to this, or subscribe to an opinion you heard a standup comedian on Tel-Aviv Central say like "dey got tanks and a-10 warthogs and nukes doe!!!", please just close your mouth.

The point of restrictive immigration isn't racism, whatever retarded argument you heard the "conservatives" (really co-opted neo-liberal totalitarians) making on talmudvision. It's about economics. It's about not diluting the economic value of the American peon. Do you really think it's "stupid" to try and avoid diluting your worth to that of a Chinese factory slave, or do you in fact not do any thinking whatsoever, and instead parrot what you heard on the picture box?
No i think its fair what you say about immigration and am aware its why its an issue at all. But there are much broader issues at hand, especially in america, that are diluting our work force.

Ive seen lots of really real reasons why immigration policy is a thing in Europe. In america our immigration problems arent even close to as big of an issue as they are there.

anyway a political war on immigration is dumb and we should just work on it logically.. not have all my unemployed cousins blame immigration as the fault for them drinking all day doing nothing having nothing valube to offer any work.

As for gun control if guns were keeping our elected overlords in check then you're just as dumb as I am. Thats just crazy talk. Honestly saying they have a-10's is smarter than thinking a drunk unemployed idiot with a gun who still gets week in the knee's when a fight breaks out at a bar is keeping the vampires from unziping their skin suits and eating our brains then you just cray.

The judicial branch is the most vital "check and balance" of the american system.
  #6  
Old 07-31-2015, 11:57 PM
central scrutinizer central scrutinizer is offline
Large Bat


Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 12
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Big_Japan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The point of gun ownership isn't fun, or self-defense from groids (although the right to have such is absolutely vital), it's inspiring the fear in state masters that comprises the most vital, if unspoken, "check and balance" of the American system.

That's actually not really true, if you read writings such as the first congressional debate on arms and militias 1789 and relevant correspondence from the founders before during and after the ratification of the second amendment (you can do this at the Library Of Congress online probably, I don't know...such things did not exist when I read up on it...) you will see a very different picture.

The second Amendment of the US constitution is not to keep the government in check at all. The founders had just fought a brutal war to establish their government, they did not want it to be destroyed. The Second Amendment is not meant to fight domestic tyranny as, because domestic tyranny is not supposed to be possible, the purpose of the second amendment was to create a government that had no teeth with which to exert tyranny in the first place.

The USA is not supposed to have a standing army in peacetime. Just a Navy. For mainland defense, every citizen is supposed to be in a militia that is ready and able to assist in national defense. Regional forces are supposed to be autonomous except for when war has been officially declared, only then are they supposed to have federal oversight.


Every able bodied man in the USA is supposed to be in a militia.

The idea that guns are ever to be pointed inwards is just marketing for manufacturers taking advantage of . They don't actually care if you know the depth of your responsibilities as an American. They just want you to buy shit. And vote for the people who are most likely to help them achieve higher sales, and more lucrative military contracts.

And of course, people love rights, but are not always as enthusiastic about responsibilities.

Normally I'd talk a bit of shit to you for being lazy about something that I learned about back when the only option to do so was a card catalog and a stack of books, and many, many hour...But the fact that the military should not exist in its current state and that you and your dad and any brothers should be subject to combat training and drills has been actively suppressed through omission for the majority of America's existence.

Look into it, it's very interesting, you should learn the true scope of the founder's intent; they were not just cobbling together an unlikely nation, they were trying to create a new paradigm for humanity.

If you're capable of stepping away from the buzzwords and rhetoric, that is. You don't seem to have much else going on, but hope springs eternal.
  #7  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:36 PM
Pokesan Pokesan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 5,958
Default

you're saying domestic gun ownership is a legitimate threat to the us military?
  #8  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:42 PM
Big_Japan Big_Japan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: shrapnel city
Posts: 1,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pokesan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
you're saying domestic gun ownership is a legitimate threat to the us military?
Not in a conventional war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/War_in...%80%93present)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_Revolution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...rrilla_warfare
  #9  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:43 PM
iruinedyourday iruinedyourday is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 7,351
Default

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There will never be a "war".
  #10  
Old 07-30-2015, 10:45 PM
Big_Japan Big_Japan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: shrapnel city
Posts: 1,196
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by iruinedyourday [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

There will never be a "war".
I don't disagree. We will be disarmed.
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:41 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.