Bard Page

[ECDubz]

Honestly though, I would rather have the nav box than to have it the old way. If i have to deal with the nav box to have the song info id gladly trade it back.

[TarukShmaruk]

Your opinions are shitty and the Ranger page looks great.

[kaev]

Originally Posted by TarukShmaruk [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your opinions are [your own] and the Ranger page looks great [to me].

ftfy. Stop being a douche here. Go rant about Cecily's aesthetic sensibilities on RnF if they bother you that much.


Personally I think the aesthetics of both versions are nothing to get excited about. Tempest in a teapot. I do appreciate that there are people who spend time trying to make sure the info presented is accurate and easily accessible. I do not mind if the people doing this wish to put their own stamp on the page's appearance.

[TarukShmaruk]

Stop crying when you get called out. You come here and be a smarmy little bitch towards someone elses hard work while simultaneously contributing nothing of value.

What did you expect?

[ezri]

I'm getting frustrated with those {{#lsth:}} includes, they seem to be really temperamental whether they actually include the content or not, on the preview it looks fine then when you press save it seems to be 50/50 whether the content is included or you get a link to the content.

Okay - so I think my plan will be:
1. Finish the redesign and implementation of the gearing guides - making the pages per class rather than per tier so they can be included in class pages without #lsth:
2. Do the same with the quest guides.
3. Finish making the new spell lists for all classes and adding them to class pages as alternative spell links; and once that's done see where we end up.