Rules regarding no-drop items and multiple characters

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by evilkorn [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean no disrespect by posting a resolved petition but here is my ruling:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean plenty of disrespect, that's a bad ruling and you're doing the community a disservice by posting it.

[Tenlaar]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mean plenty of disrespect, that's a bad ruling and you're doing the community a disservice by posting it.

I think it does the community a service to show that the same situation can be ruled differently by different GMs. One says it's ok, the other says it's not, so do it at your own risk apparently.

Insulting a person because of a proven ruling made by a GM it shitty, by the way.

[Cecily]

Originally Posted by Tenlaar [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think it does the community a service to show that the same situation can be ruled differently by different GMs. One says it's ok, the other says it's not, so do it at your own risk apparently.

Insulting a person because of a proven ruling made by a GM it shitty, by the way.

Ok, I'm not saying that I'm not a shitty person, but encouraging people (using what's most likely an incomplete look at the situation) directly or indirectly to ninja loot is gonna result in some name calling from me. I don't care if Lord Rogean himself comes to this thread and say's it is cool. It's not, and it's up to the community to enforce our own code of conduct regardless of what is and is not "technically" legal.

[fiveeauxfour]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok, I'm not saying that I'm not a shitty person...

"I'm n̶o̶t̶ saying that I'm n̶o̶t̶ a shitty person..."

those "not's" cancel out, ya know =P

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Cecily [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ok, I'm not saying that I'm not a shitty person, but encouraging people (using what's most likely an incomplete look at the situation) directly or indirectly to ninja loot is gonna result in some name calling from me. I don't care if Lord Rogean himself comes to this thread and say's it is cool. It's not, and it's up to the community to enforce our own code of conduct regardless of what is and is not "technically" legal.

There would be no raid classes and rules if this was remotely possible.

[Brut]

Sounds iffy about the FFA if you log thing. I thought the server basic rule about lewt is "you killed it, it's yours till it rots".

I mean you do lose the camp logging off to an alt, of course. But imo the item on the corpse belongs to the guy who killed the mob, unless he decides otherwise. People should in general just understand not to touch a corpse they did not make, no matter what the story behind it.

[Swish]

Originally Posted by Brut [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

People should in general just understand not to touch a corpse they did not make, no matter what the story behind it.

[Ravager]

That is a bad ruling.

[Swish]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Pringles]

Eunomia already addressed this a few weeks back:

http://www.project1999.com/forums/sh...9&postcount=49