![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
turn in the POD book for no lvl restrictions
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
I'm down for no level restrictions. And item loots. Fact is 90%+ people won't play on a server like that.
__________________
Ridez Druid
Thunderfoot Cleric Charmz Enchanter Love PvP. Retired from P99 due to lack of PvP | ||
|
|
|||
|
#24
|
||||
|
Quote:
Best in slot level 60s would run around killing level 10 players in rags and looting their shit. Sure stuff like that happened on Sullon, but on SZ you had the level 60 "Anti-PK" players who'd push in the poop of the griefers. You character reputation as a lowbie PKer actually had negative consequences. On this server? You'd see people making Youtube videos bragging about it. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
Don't get me wrong, I'm not for LESS PvP, I just want to be able to participate in the PvP that is directly impacting me. Being forced to sit as a spectator as some asshole basically shuts down my fun for the night is wack. It's the opposite of PvP. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#26
|
|||
|
the level 39s and 40s you were grouping with still wouldn't be able to attack a level 53 ganking you, though. i agree, i'm all for PVP on the PVP server, but you're going to have the same issue no matter what the level range is.
__________________
Escapegoat / Pharmakos / Madriax
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
+/- 4 is classic!
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#28
|
|||
|
actually it was 8 on tallon and vallon,
but these days the cry babies are so prevalent, better keep it 4
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#29
|
||||
|
lol range is good what we need are more FFA zones
__________________
The Rushmore Doctrine
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#30
|
|||
|
Keep the range the same in regards to higher levels attacking lower, change it so that you can attack someone that is higher level but if you do you get flagged for no-range pvp until you zone or die.
That's my terrible idea for the day. | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|