Kinda wish it was bigger than +/- 4 levels...

[Tassador]

Yeah bring back +-8 to many people oor make it 16 levels and no cap for low leves

[Rushmore]

lol range is good what we need are more FFA zones

[Fame]

turn in the POD book for no lvl restrictions

[Fame]

cant believe no one else knows this lol [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[kildone]

I'm down for no level restrictions. And item loots. Fact is 90%+ people won't play on a server like that.

[HalflingWarrior]

Originally Posted by kildone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm down for no level restrictions. And item loots. Fact is 90%+ people won't play on a server like that.

Do you blame them? Again, there's not "character reputation," let alone honor, on this server.

Best in slot level 60s would run around killing level 10 players in rags and looting their shit. Sure stuff like that happened on Sullon, but on SZ you had the level 60 "Anti-PK" players who'd push in the poop of the griefers. You character reputation as a lowbie PKer actually had negative consequences.

On this server? You'd see people making Youtube videos bragging about it.

[pharmakos]

the level 39s and 40s you were grouping with still wouldn't be able to attack a level 53 ganking you, though. i agree, i'm all for PVP on the PVP server, but you're going to have the same issue no matter what the level range is.

[Clark]

+/- 4 is classic!

[Tune]

actually it was 8 on tallon and vallon,

but these days the cry babies are so prevalent, better keep it 4

[Madbad]

Keep the range the same in regards to higher levels attacking lower, change it so that you can attack someone that is higher level but if you do you get flagged for no-range pvp until you zone or die.

That's my terrible idea for the day.