Ranger or Warrior

[RKromwell]

An untwinked warrior will never be able to solo like a ranger can and we take a beating better than a druid. /shrug

[Tseng]

"WE CAN'T FINISH THIS RAID.... THERE AREN'T ENOUGH RANGERS."

[Cheps]

Rangers can tank in groups just fine, I tanked most of the time all the way to 50. Warriors tank better but a ranger with decent items can do well and can hold aggro at least, so it depends what you are killing IMHO. Of course SK or paladin would be a better choice.

At raid level it's different, rangers are mostly DPS and CC. Warriors are tanks. So if you aim for raiding, do you want to be a tank or DPS/CC?

[fastboy21]

playing either of these classes untwinked in classic sucks balls.

[ziggyholiday]

Originally Posted by fastboy21 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

playing either of these classes untwinked in classic sucks balls.

/thread

[Duie]

I played a ranger till lvl 55 and Id have to say that geting groups was pretty hard but it was also challenging.The Real question is to SoW or not to SoW
And that is a toughey.


Seeing it will take a week to get EQ titanium i guess i have a lot of time to think on it.

[Messianic]

You have my bow

[Tronjer]

Rangers will become useful at level 60.

When they can pre-tank with weapon shield.

[ShivanAngel]

We do decent DPS once we get our epics, however I had my epics in kunark and I had to shelves earthcaller quite a bit (at least during the first part of the fight). If i got a proc or two off before the tank got good agro, guess who was going splat.

played a ranger during the real classic, being the deathtouch bitch was a blast...

[semvo]

Originally Posted by Messianic [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have my bow

And my axe.