Spells: Charm much less reliable after patch.

[Grimjaw]

I think the only problem is that the patch note should have just said "less dependable" and not "more dependable". thats what has OP's panties in a bunch.

also:

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[curtischoy]

Originally Posted by Grimjaw

I think the only problem is that the patch note should have just said "less dependable" and not "more dependable". thats what has OP's panties in a bunch.

If this were true, then yes; I believe this post would have never been made. But it is not true. The opposite is true. (Literally, in fact)

"Shits Classic" Agreed; but this was not what was stated in the notes. I'm sure that is all OP is saying. And it makes sense to say it, given the notes.

[Grimjaw]

ive noticed all spells that "Hold" are less dependable across the board - invis, roots, charms...

so maybe one change made charm more dependable, whereas another change nurfed those "Hold" type spells across the board. which net resulted in a nurf to charm

[Rayzor84]

Originally Posted by Grimjaw [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ive noticed all spells that "Hold" are less dependable across the board - invis, roots, charms...

so maybe one change made charm more dependable, whereas another change nurfed those "Hold" type spells across the board. which net resulted in a nurf to charm

I've noticed this as well but thought it was bad luck with the invis. I know they outright nerfed root so that accounts for root breaks. But I shouldn't be getting a hs pyre golem breaking 3x in one fight against another pyre golem.

[Slowride]

Who is that? in that picture? I have seen that in a video once.. don't recall what one however.

[Grimjaw]

Brad McQuaid

[Raev]

I dusted off Loraen for a few hours last night; charm held just fine as far as I could see.