![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
|||
|
1) /anon
2) Don't cast any spells 3) Tell people you are a warrior | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
You can make people believe you are a rogue. The main advantage here is you never to buff anyone. Hide your epic though.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Good Rangers are hard to find and the xp penalty doesn't help. Given that, most people would much rather go for another class. But when they get a good Ranger, well, that's a different story.
Failing that, and you want to play a Ranger, go female human or wood elf. Everyone loves that '99 pixel butt.
__________________
Originally Cyphous, the High Elf Paladin - Xegony, back in '99 (pre-Kunark)
P99 - Blue Lafael - Druid - Level 60 Garnagle - Necro - Level 57 Seductress - Enchanter - Level 52 Sweets - Bard - Level 35 Venexia - Shaman - Level 60 Wonderelf - Warrior - Level 51 | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
Solo. Groups are over rated, and frequently boring.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
No need to take it personally, it's just the way the game was at this point. The usefulness of other classes in a xp group setting is greater. In you MM group are you going to take the ranger over the 8 epic rogue twinks sitting at the zone line? I say this as a wizard, a class that is more useless in an xp group situation than any.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Rangers are Schrodinger's class. Due to the popular hate / xp penalty / etc any ranger you group with is either gonna be a super awesome player or the most awful legolas fanboy newb ever.
You just gotta open that box to find out! | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|