![]() |
#21
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
In both situations, the details are unknown and the words used mean different things to different people. And that's why I was surprised to see a change so suddenly, even if strong evidence is exceedingly rare. The "err on the side of harder" is perfectly fine; I'd never seen that stated before. | |||
Last edited by Tecmos Deception; 07-21-2014 at 06:49 PM..
|
#22
|
|||
|
![]() Context is important. The beginning of that paragraph includes the phrase "We were on a raid" and near the end is "easy to kill". But I think you were being glib.
I dunno why this surprises people. Before they got the coding to make mobs slow-immune, they had MR immunity to accomplish the same goal. I'm willing to bet there are quite a few mobs on this server that aren't very magic resistant, that were magic immune during classic.
__________________
| ||
Last edited by Daldaen; 07-21-2014 at 07:49 PM..
|
#23
|
|||
|
![]() Gj Dald pal
| ||
#24
|
|||
|
![]() I agree with tecmos, you have 2 very short posts that say he is 'almost' fully mr.. that means nothing, there is no context, it could have been a lvl50 cleric trying to stun him or a 60 shaman trying to slow him, theres a huge difference. Currently on my 60 shaman dartain is very mr if you dont tash and malo him, how can you base this change off such poor information.
The first guy doesn't even remember the npcs name!
__________________
Pint
| ||
Last edited by Pint; 07-23-2014 at 06:10 PM..
|
#25
|
|||
|
![]() Problem is, Hole is a very unknown zone in classic. Dartain the Lost didn't appear in most mob databases until after 2001. The ones that had him before that, had minimal info.
It was quite common in classic for mobs to have magic immunity as means to prevent slow from trivializing mobs as I noted above. I suspect that this mob, being the 2nd hardest 'boss' in the Hole, was magic immune as means to prevent slow. If you find a post in era 2000-2001 saying that they could snare, root or slow Dartain, throw it up. But as is, that guy made a specific point to say he was magic immune. And it makes sense because of above. Him being soloable on this server by chanters and shamans isn't classic.
__________________
| ||
#26
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
__________________
Pint
| |||
#27
|
|||
|
![]() 1) He already had several anti-MR flags, although he had a very low MR value. This gives some behind the scenes evidence that someone thought he should be resistant.
2) There is more evidence that he should be resistant than there is that he should not be. Find some evidence that he should be slowable and/or soloable in classic. 3) It goes with the group spirit of Everquest. I have no doubt that he was soloable on P99, moreso if/when people understood which immunities he had. I have no doubt that there is or was a character just sitting at his spawnpoint soloing him every 36 hours. I would rather have him remain up and be killed by groups that walk through. 4) His drops are very good items and will remain lucrative even in Velious. His drop chance has increased overall, and his difficulty was only really increased for those who want to solo him. He will still not be a challenge for most groups. | ||
Last edited by Alunova; 07-23-2014 at 07:45 PM..
|
#28
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
Everlore doesn't have him until 2002 Allakhazam has a single post on Dartain, from 2012, and it claims he never even existed... Allakhazam posts that I have are from the 3 items on his loot table. Most of them just talk about the lore of Dartain being an apprentice of Miragul. There are very few comments about Dartain himself as a mob, of them probably 5-10, and 2 of those are about his magic immunity. The other 3-4 talk about 2 item drops.
__________________
| |||
#29
|
|||||
|
![]() As usual, heres my take.
The guy who posted those comments was part of a raid in 2001. If you go into his post history, you can see he is commenting as a level 52 on a paladin quest in January 2002. You can further go into his profile and see that he left Allakhazam as a 54 paladin with fairly substandard gear in Velious. http://everquest.allakhazam.com/db/u...ml?char=107143 I don't think you should implement change based on the findings of what was likely a level <52 paladin on a level 55 mob that may or may not been debuffed. Also, if you feel like doing some major detective work, this Aegiral is the same one on allakhazam: http://www.network54.com/Forum/16639/page-68 If you translate the page, you get posts like: Quote:
Quote:
So... a guy who was at most level 56 (likely 52-54) was fighting a potentially debuffed level 55 mob and claiming the mob was MR based on inability to land stuns (no shit, he's not stunnable). This is the evidence that you're using for change? We do see he did drop 2 items though.
__________________
| ||||
#30
|
||||
|
![]() Bingo, dude was level 52 in August 2001 with the 'MR' posts being posted by him in July 2001.
Aug 23, 2001 Aegiral Paladin 52 http://www.network54.com/Forum/16639/viewall-page-57 Quote:
__________________
| |||
Last edited by pasi; 07-23-2014 at 09:07 PM..
|
![]() |
|
|