Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Server Issues > Bugs > Velious Beta > Mechanics

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 04-23-2014, 03:48 PM
Rogean Rogean is offline
¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Rogean's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 5,377
Default

Eashan's Attack? I dunno you'd have to ask him. I'm too lazy to log into his character.

Eashen's attack? The value would mean nothing to you, they are specific for our system.
__________________
Sean "Rogean" Norton
Project 1999 Co-Manager

Project 1999 Setup Guide
  #22  
Old 04-23-2014, 03:55 PM
pasi pasi is offline
Planar Protector

pasi's Avatar

Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,078
Default

The logs don't look too off. Eashen is a high DPS mob, but he doesn't have much HP. If he's absolutely stomping tanks, the problem likely lies with NPCs being able to get haste from their inventory/loot.

AC didn't mean a thing beyond 289 real AC until close to PoP as it should be hardcapped and then switched to softcap w/ weak returns later on. The gear that gave you HP generally gave you enough AC to hit the hardcap/abysmal softcap returns. Hammered Golden Hoop was BiS (w/ Vryinn's obv) for a reason.

Defensive is a thing to prevent damage spikes. Evasive will usually be more effective at reducing your overall damage intake. However, with CHeal chains, you are not worried about your tanks damage intake rather than how vulnerable you are to losing your tank to spikes

With defensive, you can run a 4 second cheal rotation here and have little danger of tank death (would need 3 ripostes).
__________________
  #23  
Old 04-23-2014, 04:01 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,466
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rogean [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Eashan's Attack? I dunno you'd have to ask him. I'm too lazy to log into his character.

Eashen's attack? The value would mean nothing to you, they are specific for our system.
Very good Emperor, very good.

ATK isn't being taken into account, so you're tweaking your own system to match it.

I imagine I'll revisit this when its much too late for changes to be considered. I'd probably suggest being interested in ATK and doing it right from the ground up.
  #24  
Old 04-23-2014, 04:13 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,953
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Very good Emperor, very good.

ATK isn't being taken into account, so you're tweaking your own system to match it.

I imagine I'll revisit this when its much too late for changes to be considered. I'd probably suggest being interested in ATK and doing it right from the ground up.
There is a baseline attack based on mob level and stats. And we can add to that with additional amounts. It does not translate into same meaning of attack that client use value vs value.

The data for emu does not have specific stats, skills, etc on a per mob basis.

H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
  #25  
Old 04-23-2014, 04:15 PM
Nirgon Nirgon is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Ruins of Old Paineel
Posts: 14,466
Default

Whoa hey whoa. I've seen/been told time and again (by players) ATK means nothing here.

I'm not an AC expert. I just dropped some links and asked what his ATK was, you said it wouldn't matter to me... which I took out of context (thousand pardons).

I just don't want to see you guys go to a bunch of trouble and then a piece of evidence arises that undoes everything. Dat's it.

Oh I want it classic. Lemme get that in there too.

Methinks compiling as many logs as exist on the internet helps and this is no simple issue to tackle.

Whoever claims to be an AC expert, must also claim to be an ATK expert... glhf.
  #26  
Old 04-23-2014, 05:09 PM
Shiftin Shiftin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 755
Default

I feel like we're really ignoring the second part of the original post in that players are hitting for quite a bit less on these mobs than is expected. Would my logs from our Eashen fight be useful in that regard? I can post or email them if so.

I have BIS kunark weapons and the max ATK possible without casted avatar or velious aura of battle items (Tormax quest belt), so there should be pretty direct comparisons you could draw between my damage and damage during velious.
  #27  
Old 04-23-2014, 06:16 PM
Haynar Haynar is offline
Developer

Haynar's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: West of the Mississippi
Posts: 2,953
Default

I have not looked at anything with pc on mob damage. All my ac changes were done with client dmg mitigation.

Played a tank class on live. So that is more my area, than stuff affecting dps on mobs.

H
__________________
Haynar <Millennial Snowflake Utopia>
  #28  
Old 04-23-2014, 06:56 PM
Shiftin Shiftin is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 755
Default

How would you like us to help you (or who) approach that aspect of the testing? Beyond a general feel of "mobs are taking too long to die" I mean.

On Eashen it's less of a problem, but on mobs with a lot more HP, a fight taking 50% longer due to mob mitigation issues is a big deal.

There's only so much a melee DPS can do to impact their outgoing DPS once they have BIS weapons and understand strafing and aggro management. I can barely affect my +ATK outside of choosing VOG or getting Avatar cast to me because its components (Str, weapon skill) are capped. Going into Eashen I was doing the most damage a fully geared Kunark era rogue could do, and i lucked into the lightning claw, so short of getting a heartwood thorn off tunare (not downed with loot until near or after TOV was cleared on live) or the +ATK belt from yelinak's head, i'm doing the same damage a fully geared velious rogue would have done.
__________________
Shiftin Anout
Formerly of Tunare
Last edited by Shiftin; 04-23-2014 at 07:00 PM..
  #29  
Old 04-23-2014, 07:37 PM
Alunova Alunova is offline
Developer


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 545
Default

NPC AC values were incredibly low across the board and I believe many people are used to 32k dragons after being in kunark etc. for so long.

Our NToV raids typically had at least 8 clerics and at least 20 pure dps classes (rogues, wizards, monks etc.) The fights lasted much longer than 5 minutes even then.

If you look at old logs from the era, you will see warriors hitting for 1 and 5 and 9, 7/10 swings, and the other 3 are misses.

There is one thing that can easily add dps to a raid and that is to bring more dps players.

I'll keep reviewing and balancing, but there are a thousand factors to consider. Making sure there is some purpose for wizards other than Hoshkar/Zlexak is one of them. Making sure bosses are killable (in most cases), but not steamroll easy is another.
Last edited by Alunova; 04-23-2014 at 07:46 PM..
  #30  
Old 04-23-2014, 07:52 PM
Splorf22 Splorf22 is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 3,236
Default

Maybe that's why everyone loved Gharn's Rock of Smashing? 6/13 on the face of it should suck.

Also Shiftin, did you have avatar?
__________________
Raev | Loraen | Sakuragi <The A-Team> | Solo Artist Challenge | Farmer's Market
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arteker
in words of anal fingers, just a filthy spaniard
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:48 PM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.