WTB A title for Bob

[Bubbles]

lol Bob's getting internet pwned by some guy who decided he wanted to trade a 40% penalty to melee as an erudite.

[purist]

Originally Posted by Bubbles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol Bob's getting internet pwned by some guy who decided he wanted to trade a 40% penalty to melee as an erudite.

So you think you if roll a Human Pally instead of an Erudite Pally and that hybrid xp penalty magically dissapears? Retarded much? Any hybrid, whether you're Erudite or not, is gonna have a 40% hybrid class penalty. Unless you're a Troll SK and want to factor in race penalty on top of that or whatever.

[Bubbles]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So you think you if roll a Human Pally instead of an Erudite Pally and that hybrid xp penalty magically dissapears? Retarded much? Any hybrid, whether you're Erudite or not, is gonna have a 40% hybrid class penalty. Unless you're a Troll SK and want to factor in race penalty on top of that or whatever.

Nah, it's a separate thought process: You're at character select... You want to play an erudite, but you also want to melee... Nothing about being human involved.

The real issue here is how is a guy who never leaves a static spot in EC tunnel having a title affect anyone in any way shape or form? It certainly can't ruin your EQ experience, and if it does I feel sorry for you.

I made the poll, slow day in the tunnel thread. People seem in favor of it. I haven't contacted any GMs or /petitioned it or anything (lol). This has ZERO to do with the idiots who want to dick-wave about the fact they killed some mob first or are better at camping a dragon than someone else. THOSE are the 'title requests' that should mocked and laughed at and cause page upon page of R&F fodder.

I mean, if I seriously wanted this to happen, I'd just go PL Bob to 20 and he'd /surname. And we'd send you a /tell to make sure you knew it happened. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[purist]

Originally Posted by Bubbles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The real issue here is how is a guy who never leaves a static spot in EC tunnel having a title affect anyone in any way shape or form? It certainly can't ruin your EQ experience,

Ah, the good old "well, how does it affect you?" argument. The long long cousin of the "lolumad" argument and a staple of 12-year old preteen girls nationwide.

Please let me know when you have an actual substantive argument besides "lolumad" or one of its many variants (i.e. "lol, it will make you mad.")

[Messianic]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Time to get over yourself, son. There've been plenty of folks who have done the exact same thing you do, and have done it a lot better. Only difference is you have a far more inflated sense of self-importance than they did and a far more aggressive and shameless self-marketing strategy.

lol.



Bob has been nothing but entirely humble, even with your stupid insults. I fail to see what you're referring to in your unreasonable anger. He's not the one who suggested the title as far as I know...

[purist]

I fail to see any contradiction. Yes, a server first involves dedication to achieve. No one disputes that. However, dedication alone , and dedication in and of itself, is not a sufficient criterion for a title. If you think it does, I have no problem showing you how quickly that argument stands up. It's not just about dedication, it's being the first. And not only is Bob not the first to offer such services, but the "services" are a retarded as a "server first" title. Lets give a "server first" to the first casino "services," too? Give a "server first" to the first guy to offer porting "services" for donations? Great idea, retard.

[Anaiyah]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I fail to see any contradiction. Yes, a server first involves dedication to achieve. No one disputes that. However, dedication alone , and dedication in and of itself, is not a sufficient criterion for a title. If you think it does, I have no problem showing you how quickly that argument stands up. It's not just about dedication, it's being the first. And not only is Bob not the first to offer such services, but the "services" are a retarded as a "server first" title. Lets give a "server first" to the first casino "services," too? Give a "server first" to the first guy to offer porting "services" for donations? Great idea, retard.

No one is trying to bust out the rulebook on why he should have a title. Its just a funny idea thats pretty awesome...you sound like a sad little dipshit.

[purist]

Its just a funny idea thats pretty awesome...you sound like a sad little dipshit.

A "funny idea that's pretty awesome." Wow. Really compelling argument for a title. Glad I reduced your case for a title to something as blatantly retarded as a "funny idea" that "sounds pretty awesome."

[Anaiyah]

Originally Posted by purist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A "funny idea that's pretty awesome." Wow. Really compelling argument for a title. Glad I reduced your case for a title to something as blatantly retarded as a "funny idea" that "sounds pretty awesome."

Butthurt much?

[purist]

Ah, the "lolumad" card, the steadfast refuge of a retard with no argument.