|
|
|
|
#1
03-29-2014, 01:18 AM
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
03-28-2014, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
I was told that the code for exp on p99 isn't classic, but not sure how accurate that is.
Whenever a post or question comes up like this my reaction is always the same: When you're leveling a character, no matter what race/class combo, 50% of the way through lvl 54 is exactly halfway to lvl 60 from lvl 1. In other words, the experience that it takes you to get from lvl 1-54.5 is equal to the experience it takes you to get from 54.5-60. When you think of 1-60 in those terms, how slow the exp gain is through the upper 50's just makes sense a bit more.
__________________
-Aftermath-
Tasslehof - 60 Druid Barlow - 60 monk Blueberrii - 60 Mage Gigglepurr - 60 Shaman Kids - 60 Rogue Fornfamnad - 60 Cleric | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
03-28-2014, 08:38 PM
|
|||
|
Each hell level adds a .1 modifier to your total XP required to reach the end of that hell level. So 30 needs about twice 29 but at higher levels the .1 extra on the mood is a relatively increase than earlier.
Mobs won't give less XP at 55 than 54 unless the mob is light blue or green. Read the XP formula info on the wiki. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
03-29-2014, 06:34 AM
|
|||
|
I vote for the WOmble party!
...all lengths are relative in the darkness of the burra...
__________________
"I have been freed from the shackles of pixel lust."
Are YOU Cleansed from the chains of digital desire? | ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
03-29-2014, 08:28 AM
|
|||
|
Always heard that 54 and 59 were by far the worst levels.
When I leveled my shaman up about a year ago, nothing really felt different about 54. It just felt like the levels were progressively longer. 55 slightly longer than 54, 56 slightly longer than 55, etc. Leveling my second character through the 50s (currently 58) and it feels the same to me, nothing special about 54.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
