Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Red Community > Red Server Chat

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 01-15-2014, 03:32 PM
Kergan Kergan is offline
Planar Protector

Kergan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Another thread where common sense isn't used/situation doesn't matter/Nihi trying to make the PNP look bad because it's vaguely written.

A situation where GM's didn't consult players or think it through, and went with their own implementation which was vague and involving way too much manpower.

Typical Red99 shit. The PNP would work perfect if there wasn't a specific guild that takes this more serious than their real life, and are trying to bend and twist every situation to still corpse camp and grief instead of just being decent human beings when people surrender.

Instead Nihi take advantage of the vague way it was written and create endless hours of bullshit on where the line of grief is allowed, and cry about every individual issue instead of just acting decent.
Step 1: Point out flaws in PNP
Step 1 result: Proposed changes shit on by opposition, threads destroyed, no meaningful changes.
Step 2: Try step one again. And again.
Step 2 result: Fail.
Step 3: Prove issues in PNP by demonstrating them.
Step 3 result: Opposition to steps 1 and 2 suddenly see the issues.
Step 4: Now that all are agreed the system isn't perfect, petition staff to look at making PNP changes.
Step 4 result: Pending, but early signs indicate a promising result.

The more you post the more I'm convinced that server health, increased population, etc are just not part of your agenda despite what you claim. You have some unhealthy obsession/hatred for Nihilum. It's evidenced by the fact even your own guild/side has deviated from your positions recently, clearly you're becoming a forumquest liability.
  #22  
Old 01-15-2014, 04:31 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

Proposing flaw in LNS by saying spies can come back in and check things out.

Does not apply to any advantage in-game other than Sebilis(oh no they can see the entrance, so can a DA'd cleric). What this is, is overloading the GM's with bullshit hoping they give up on the idea entirely.

So transparent it hurts, since RD has never given a guild nearly as much grief over LNSing like Nihi has.

Example Gore, massive shit talk, giving some res's not others, forcing everyone to take 1 YT.

You guys don't point out flaws, you abuse the vague part of the policy, no one said the policy was perfect, but if the players won't agree to it (Nihilum) then the GM's will either have to go hard and push the point home, or just give up.

We'll see what they choose.
  #23  
Old 01-15-2014, 04:33 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

Unfortunately I agree they brought this somewhat on themselves by making the policy so vague, and apply to all PVP even insignificant bullshit like this.
  #24  
Old 01-15-2014, 04:37 PM
Mac Dretti Mac Dretti is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Proposing flaw in LNS by saying spies can come back in and check things out.

Does not apply to any advantage in-game other than Sebilis(oh no they can see the entrance, so can a DA'd cleric). What this is, is overloading the GM's with bullshit hoping they give up on the idea entirely.

So transparent it hurts, since RD has never given a guild nearly as much grief over LNSing like Nihi has.

Example Gore, massive shit talk, giving some res's not others, forcing everyone to take 1 YT.

You guys don't point out flaws, you abuse the vague part of the policy, no one said the policy was perfect, but if the players won't agree to it (Nihilum) then the GM's will either have to go hard and push the point home, or just give up.

We'll see what they choose.
PvE death doesn't get lns.

The 1 yt rez in for LnS was to protect all sides from being killed more than once/lns violation.

Dealwithit stasis live journal
  #25  
Old 01-15-2014, 04:47 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

Wrong, you chose who got a res - because clerics of LNSing group were not allowed to cast their own. Had nothing to do with protecting yourselves, you talked shit the entire time like "following the PNP to the letter LNS now bitches" etc.

Another gray area Nihi decided to abuse to the max - the GM's pushed Nihi a bit and now they are pushing back in a different way. I hope GM's aren't intimidated by the neckbeards, population was over 200 yesterday, imagine that.
  #26  
Old 01-15-2014, 04:54 PM
Mac Dretti Mac Dretti is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Wrong, you chose who got a res - because clerics of LNSing group were not allowed to cast their own. Had nothing to do with protecting yourselves, you talked shit the entire time like "following the PNP to the letter LNS now bitches" etc.

Another gray area Nihi decided to abuse to the max - the GM's pushed Nihi a bit and now they are pushing back in a different way. I hope GM's aren't intimidated by the neckbeards, population was over 200 yesterday, imagine that.
Are you accusing me of using mature language in OOC? Your rage is causing you to fabricate details.

You are correct about choosing who we would offer rezzes too, the whiners and idiots can port themselves and don't deserve enemy guild hand holding.
  #27  
Old 01-15-2014, 04:59 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

Right exactly it shouldn't be up to the winning guild to decide who gets res's from the surrendering guild(the losing guild should be able to CR/res themselves and leave)

That's another example of Nihi bending the rules to try and get the GM's to give up on it - sure hope they don't, only time will tell !

Been awfully quiet from them recently.
  #28  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:00 PM
Mac Dretti Mac Dretti is offline
Banned


Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,337
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right exactly it shouldn't be up to the winning guild to decide who gets res's from the surrendering guild(the losing guild should be able to CR/res themselves and leave)

That's another example of Nihi bending the rules to try and get the GM's to give up on it - sure hope they don't, only time will tell !

Been awfully quiet from them recently.
U guys chose not to surrender and log off and or cry about it. Those who surrendered got their corpses and moved on.
  #29  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:05 PM
Stasis01 Stasis01 is offline
Banned


Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 4,402
Default

=) OK
  #30  
Old 01-15-2014, 05:27 PM
Kergan Kergan is offline
Planar Protector

Kergan's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 5,052
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stasis01 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
=) OK
First Stasis post in 3 months without the word Nihilum in it, bravo!
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:51 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.