To FE/IB: poopsocking dont pay! - Page 3

Alarti0001 · #21 11-05-2013, 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Origin [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Alarti confirmed bigger retard than Eccetard.

Origin confirmed biggerest retard of dem all

Origin · #22 11-05-2013, 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Origin confirmed biggerest retard of dem all

No u r

fishingme · #23 11-05-2013, 10:36 AM

Curious, VS is a raid target which as i recall you need a certain amount of players at camp in order to "claim" the engage, no? Otherwise two people waiting for him to spawn/attacking him first is technically kiting?

arsenalpow · #24 11-05-2013, 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Curious, VS is a raid target which as i recall you need a certain amount of players at camp in order to "claim" the engage, no? Otherwise two people waiting for him to spawn/attacking him first is technically kiting?

A cleric with a donal's BP and a defensive warrior could probably hold VS for a good 2-3 minutes. Even an SK, paladin, or monk could potentially hold VS for at least 60 seconds if the Melee is buffed adequately and the cleric isn't a donk.

radditsu · #25 11-05-2013, 10:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A cleric with a donal's BP and a defensive warrior could probably hold VS for a good 2-3 minutes. Even an SK, paladin, or monk could potentially hold VS for at least 60 seconds if the Melee is buffed adequately and the cleric isn't a donk.

Because he ain't tuned right. He should be destroying a single tank with a cleric. BP or no BP.

Trak should be harder too.

This is the shit this "classic" server should be worried about. Instead of interface changes and other bullshittery.

arsenalpow · #26 11-05-2013, 10:46 AM

Ya. Also, evasive not defensive.

Frogie305 · #27 11-05-2013, 10:49 AM

https://www.youtube.com/user/kud?feature=watch < Relevant to this thread.

Ele · #28 11-05-2013, 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So they were socking with 10, and TMO was socking with two, but all socking is bad?

People will post in this thread that tracking and FTE backup spamming aggro clickies into the air doesn't count as socking . [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

fishingme · #29 11-05-2013, 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arsenalpow [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A cleric with a donal's BP and a defensive warrior could probably hold VS for a good 2-3 minutes. Even an SK, paladin, or monk could potentially hold VS for at least 60 seconds if the Melee is buffed adequately and the cleric isn't a donk.

Does that really matter? Wasn't there a minimum 14/15 or so people needed to be at camp spot before you could engage? Sorry, last time i raided that was pretty much the rules. I could easily kite a raid target around on my bard with a cleric on autofollow. I figured that the force engaging needs to be capable of killing the raid mob in order to hold FTE. Think I'd petition this and get a GMs PoV, sounds far too similar to just kiting a mob around waiting for a raid force to show.

Ele · #30 11-05-2013, 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fishingme [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Does that really matter? Wasn't there a minimum 14/15 or so people needed to be at camp spot before you could engage? Sorry, last time i raided that was pretty much the rules. I could easily kite a raid target around on my bard with a cleric on autofollow. I figured that the force engaging needs to be capable of killing the raid mob in order to hold FTE. Think I'd petition this and get a GMs PoV, sounds far too similar to just kiting a mob around waiting for a raid force to show.

That rule hasn't been around for well over a year.