![]() |
|
#21
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
Contemptor - Hierophant - Bregan D'Aerth
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#22
|
|||
|
Bards and rangers are like the Tim Tebo's of EQ. Never gonna be that super bowl quality dps you need but the intangibles are off the chart. Mez/root , snares, sow / selo's and both are excellent pullers.
__________________
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
Yeah, I'm not really looking to draw hate, I'm just looking at a realistic view of what bards can do as a main character. I'm not going to be the most sought after class for groups, and soloing yes it's possible but is it practical? As a noob to EQ trying to experience the game, I'd be better served rolling a different class to truly feel the strengths of each specialized role. Don't get me wrong, I'm a former hardcore WoW player, I had countless server firsts, blah blah no one cares because it doesn't matter here, I'm down for a challenge but at the end of the day I'm kind of surprised as to how many external factors I'm subject to as a bard. If a group has a puller, and an enchanter am I really going to be useful as a last spot filler? Sure for mana, or haste / str / dps increases if the people in the group aren't 3rd gen characters with 8 fungis and a rogue epic at level 1. As a true newcomer to EQ, and starting fresh on a server that's what 3 years stagnant a bard isn't an ideal fresh start.
I grew up with World of Warcraft and kind of got used to "carrying" people. As a druid in the early expansions you were kind of in the same boat as a bard....You had massively utility without very much specialization. There, however, it's very easy for a single person to make up for a huge lack of DPS, or healing, or tanking, or CC....A single player had a much larger effect it feels than here. So I guess most of my problem is more of an issue with the game. I'm spoiled being able to play a utility role, and then be able to solo, DPS well, whatever else I want. Goes hand in hand with how easy WoW is compared to EQ. | ||
|
Last edited by Getsmurfed; 08-20-2013 at 09:51 PM..
|
|
||
|
#25
|
||||
|
Quote:
mediocre bards are a dime a dozen, and sit afk singing mana song at raids [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] | |||
|
|
||||
|
#26
|
|||
|
It really depends on setting and circumstances. In any dungeon, I would love to have a bard in my group when shit hits the fan. Some of the saves a bard can pull off are legendary and spectacular. Everybody expects and enchanter to be able to keep 4+ mobs CC'd, not many people expect it from a bard.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#27
|
|||
|
I think most people are misunderstanding why I'm even asking what the point of bards are. I'm more than capable of running multiple mezzes, I generally actually charm and triple mez while spinning Breath of Harmony procs in filler. I have ended up pulling instances with harmony, snares, and saved my groups by kiting adds. I'm not saying bards are god awful and entirely useless. I am asking for validation that bards are truly limited in a raid scene....Did I not emphasize that enough?
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#28
|
|||
|
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#29
|
|||
|
Most classes are pretty limited in a raid scene, why do you need a fact validated?
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|