![]() |
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Should shared bank accounts be made available? | |||
| Yes |
|
40 | 43.96% |
| No |
|
51 | 56.04% |
| Voters: 91. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
By the amount of scamming done by Xois / Theync alone 50% is a conservative estimate
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#2
|
|||
|
how do you get scammed?
__________________
Current Games:
Naw | ||
|
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
I didn't. I am not an idiot.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
Well this thread proves keeping the status quo is profitable to some of the servers unsavory residents. Take note of the no votes...
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
Your forum avatar describes your perfectly. The only reason I could ever justify this is POSSIBLY for money drop transfers since we can not drop coin with the titanium client, and money in the shared bank should go poof if you log out for a period of time. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
no.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
transfer nightmares are as classic as eq gets.
stfu noob.
__________________
![]() | ||
|
|
|||
|
#9
|
|||
|
obvious answer is no
scamming is classic | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
I think it is part of what made classic fun. Getting to know people you can trust to transfer. The only problem here is that free unlimited accounts do not make personal reputation so important. I voted no as playing on live for 11 years makes me enjoy the lack of easy convenience of classic and the need to socialise and get to know people. Shared bank as convenient as it is, is one of those things that oversimplifies the game. It enables you to also shift items across huge distances which in turn makes the world a lot smaller.
| ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|