PSA: ATTN - If you are bound in raid zones, read this

[Smedy]

why the fuck do nihilum leadership allow the down syndrome kids in their ranks to represent them on the boards? god damn i've not read something this retarded in awhile

just make it happen sirken

[Pudge]

obviously that you could just sit there to monitor the zone/as a spy and cannot be ejected even if you get pvp'd to death

[Smedy]

nizzar seems upset

monk botb still haunting his dreams, poor guy

[Clark]

Originally Posted by Smedy [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

nizzar seems upset

monk botb still haunting his dreams, poor guy

[heartbrand]

I know it will come off as "supporting the company line" or some shit but if we are going to do this can we start flagging sky fire / ej / dl / KC as raid zones? What's more unfair, being able to be bound in permafrost where vox has been up for a couple of months or being able to be bound in KC where you can bind rush people doing VS?

[Sickpuppy]

Waaa waaah waaah .. Alot of sore aasholes in this thread

[heartbrand]

My care factor is like negative ten out of ten, I just don't get the logic of cracking down on obsolete zones while not applying same logic to adding a zone like KC where this has been "abused." Unlike most of the people in this thread, including Sirken, I actually played here when they added this rule to sol b and perma and the logic used at the time should extend to Kunark zones as well. RIP abysal / friedchicken / hollix accounts.

[p-niner]

not too hard to understand

rule was set during classic that solb/perma were flagged as PvP zones and binding in them was prohibited.

Nizzar exploited this and his druid stayed bound in permafrost, as a result, he was able to go to bear pit, agro 2, gate back to the lair cubby hole, and charm bears to slay vox.

IMO - all vox kills as a result of the Nizzar exploited bind should be deleted.

Even better, entire guild should be suspended, leadership banned, and a global message saying cheating is not allowed is appropriate.

[heartbrand]

How is it an "exploit" if there was never a written or even verbal rule against it? Also, wouldn't the same logic that was used to create this rule now extend to a zone such as KC? Why are you pigeon holing and fixated on just Permafrost and ignoring Fear or Sol B in your mini dissertation? Your modus operandi seems to be just hatred of Nihilum and Nizzar and therefore you'll write anything to further that purpose, while disregarding the logic that was used at the time and how it applies or does not apply currently.

[p-niner]

Originally Posted by heartbrand [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

How is it an "exploit" if there was never a written or even verbal rule against it? Also, wouldn't the same logic that was used to create this rule now extend to a zone such as KC? Why are you pigeon holing and fixated on just Permafrost and ignoring Fear or Sol B in your mini dissertation? Your modus operandi seems to be just hatred of Nihilum and Nizzar and therefore you'll write anything to further that purpose, while disregarding the logic that was used at the time and how it applies or does not apply currently.

im not gonna go searching a post from classic, but it WAS written AND verbally ruled that these PVP zones were NOT BINDABLE

L2LAWYER