NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you saying that democrats cause an inordinate amount of air pollution, or do you mean like, population density and more total cars on the road?

No, just that we already had too many people here in too small a space, now with thousands more coming

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Btw, anyone who is morbidly obese has no right to talk about climate change whatsoever. The effect of consuming disproportionately larger biomass with it's necessary logistics in transporting the food, storing the food within temperature controls, and growing the food is exponentially increasing of ones carbon footprint. Being fat has a direct correlation to ones carbon footprint, so if you're fat, you have no right to talk about global warming.

Being fat blows, but individual carbon footprints pale in comparison to policy and industrial-scale practices. Trying to get people to focus on their own carbon footprint has been an effective policy of distraction to keep people from focusing where change is most effective, such as limiting coal and changing infrastructure design.

See: plastic recycling

[Trexller]

maybe democrats are really just pissed off that they have to use gasoline engines for farm equipment instead of black people

they are still salty since they lost the war to keep black people in chains

[Lune]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, just that we already had too many people here in too small a space, now with thousands more coming

Yall are fucked when the Colorado runs dry

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Being fat blows, but individual carbon footprints pale in comparison to policy and industrial-scale practices. Trying to get people to focus on their own carbon footprint has been an effective policy of distraction to keep people from focusing where change is most effective, such as limiting coal and changing infrastructure design.

See: plastic recycling

No they don't. When you overconsume on the individual level, en masse, like Fat America does, you place an increasing supply burden AND profit motive in front of these big bad industries you're scapegoating in this post

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Btw, anyone who is morbidly obese has no right to talk about climate change whatsoever. The effect of consuming disproportionately larger biomass with it's necessary logistics in transporting the food, storing the food within temperature controls, and growing the food is exponentially increasing of ones carbon footprint. Being fat has a direct correlation to ones carbon footprint, so if you're fat, you have no right to talk about global warming.

Shelf-stable calorie dense foods.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yall are fucked when the Colorado runs dry

western USA water management in hilarious to me

"Let's grow millions of acres of farmland, in the desert!!"

[Origen]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No, just that we already had too many people here in too small a space, now with thousands more coming

Well, that sorta thing is only gonna get worse I guess. I don't really see that changing direction unless there's a change in consumer culture. Cars are only gonna get so small, public transportation development is a civic nightmare, and a lot of Americans seem like castle doctrine weirdos about lands and lawns.

Not that I like randos in my backyard, either

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Shelf-stable calorie dense foods.

Like high fructose corn syrup? Transporting, processing, packaging, and distributing that shit is not carbon neutral at all. However, violating HOA rules to grow vegetables in your yard instead of grass is. You can even have chicken scavenging in it

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Like high fructose corn syrup? Transporting, processing, packaging, and distributing that shit is not carbon neutral at all. However, violating HOA rules to grow vegetables in your yard instead of grass is. You can even have chicken scavenging in it

I wager it's less of a footprint than produced chicken.

Gotta real thoroughly hose down the abattoir every night, for example.