NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'll take your concerns regarding the welfare of children seriously when you begin to support universal, socialist healthcare [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This guy gets every scrap of his bad information from youtube millionaires, yeesh, imagine living like that.

Universal socialist healthcare sucks and even the systems that exist are subsidized by enormous taxes and the fact that the US takes care of most developed nations militaries.

I'm not against everyone getting free magic healthcare at the drop of a hat, if that's what you're implying I'm against. Although I *am* against deploying nascent, experimental and completely unproven medical treatments to minors and pretending they're totally good and fine.

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Universal socialist healthcare sucks and even the systems that exist are subsidized by enormous taxes and the fact that the US takes care of most developed nations militaries.

I'm not against everyone getting free magic healthcare at the drop of a hat, if that's what you're implying I'm against. Although I *am* against deploying nascent, experimental and completely unproven medical treatments to minors and pretending they're totally good and fine.

It's probably too late to do anything about the latter, TBH. Their quack science was "legitimized" by ((())) collision. You would essentially have to successfully lobby against the vast wealth structure currently benefitting off the lifetime consumer/subscriber model they've got going on right now, which is never gonna happen. The task is alin to defeating big agra and getting a ban on GMO entirely.

Mind you, the sockpuppets on both sides of the political aisle are benefitting tremendously from it as well, so good luck with that one

[Lune]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Well I think you're wrong too, I just usually explain why.

What part of what I said was wrong? Do more people not die from extreme cold than heat? Human beings are mammals which are warm blooded. Mull that over for a while.

Because what you're saying is just literally too stupid to engage with at this point and it's just not worth any energy. People have been telling you for years; it's not like you haven't gotten the message or nobody has ever told you. And you aren't explaining why, you're spouting surface level opinions hot off the conservosphere presses, when the actual issues are far deeper and more nuanced.

The belief that the US healthcare system is awesome and other rich Western countries' systems are shit.

The belief that there is no anthropogenic climate change, or we have no ability to alter the trajectory or mitigate it.

These things are demonstrably false and if you're specifically requesting that we, personally, educate you on them instead of you accessing the easily available information then you're just sealioning. In which case, kindly fuck off

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Because what you're saying is just literally too stupid to engage with at this point and it's just not worth any energy. People have been telling you for years; it's not like you haven't gotten the message or nobody has ever told you. And you aren't explaining why, you're spouting surface level opinions hot off the conservosphere presses, when the actual issues are far deeper and more nuanced.

The belief that the US healthcare system is awesome and other rich Western countries' systems are shit.

The belief that there is no anthropogenic climate change, or we have no ability to alter the trajectory or mitigate it.

These things are demonstrably false and if you're specifically requesting that we, personally, educate you on them instead of you accessing the easily available information then you're just sealioning. In which case, kindly fuck off

Lots of words to not actually refute anything I said. And I never said I don't believe in climate change, only that it's not the apocalyptic alarmist scenario it's broadly portrayed as. And many of the proposed prescriptions for it are anti human and anti human flourishing.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Lune [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The belief that there is no anthropogenic climate change, or we have no ability to alter the trajectory or mitigate it.

What beliefs about climate change are valid?

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What beliefs about climate change are valid?

that only 40 years of actual solid data can predict what the earth's climate will be 100 years from now

or that modern science knows exactly what the temp and carbon content of the atmosphere was 100,000 years ago

What % of our atmosphere is C02? what was it 50 years ago?

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What beliefs about climate change are valid?

Whichever ones involve giving more money to support climate change science

[Ripp]

Climate changes every day. You idiots.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Lune]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What beliefs about climate change are valid?

That the climate as a whole is getting warmer and that this is because of human activity, particularly since the industrial revolution. Energy policy has the potential to affect the trajectory of this increase over the next 100 years and beyond.

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

that only 40 years of actual solid data can predict what the earth's climate will be 100 years from now

or that modern science knows exactly what the temp and carbon content of the atmosphere was 100,000 years ago

What % of our atmosphere is C02? what was it 50 years ago?

lmao they aren't stumped, that's a retarded and loaded question. Percent is not how atmospheric gases work in a meaningful way. Scientists typically treat it as ppm. CO2 is .04 percent of the volume of the atmosphere, however the PPM has risen 50% since the industrial revolution.

With gases, percentage is not generally a useful way to handle them because they are free molecules with wildly different mass and they differ by orders of magnitude in their ability to trap heat.

The man is a disingenuous retard undoubtedly funded by petroleum companies. Also, didn't watch.

[Trexller]

chemicals in rocks tell me what the atmospheric chemical make up and air temperature was a million years ago

so you can't have a gas powered weed whacker