![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
You're so right, DSM!
Shaman solo DPS is going to be the same as group DPS in Seb/Chardok with 2 charms! Oh, wait! No, it's not. Unless you're root rotting, and therefore completely putting the shaman and his group at risk. You've been checkmated on this before, you malevolent manchild. Oh, by the way? Respond to Cyx's posts. Why is he the only "troll" you're ignoring? | ||
|
Last edited by Gloomlord; 09-18-2022 at 10:43 AM..
Reason: Had to clear up some words
| |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
Instead, you continue to troll in the childish hope I go away.
__________________
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#6
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Day 2: Still unable to find any mages willing to teleport me anywhere. Will report back any further developments
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||
|
#8
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
| |||
|
#9
|
|||
|
This is why people hate science and progress.
You left literally every non magic user, let alone the hybrids off the list entierly. | ||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Jib … it was kind of the point of the thread. An exercise in what can be done without melee.
For 99% of group content and a 6 man group I would take a well geared warrior, cleric, shaman, rogue, monk and enchanter. Sub out monk for an epic bard if they are any good. If limited to 4 and factoring in ALL content: warrrior, cleric, rog, ench. Defensive disc, rogue to open any needed doors. Too much healing and tons of cc/dps to boot. If the cam really needs FD? Swap the warrior for a sk. Otherwise bring on the trains and for heavy ass beaters you have evasive/defensive. For a duo (xp and named) Cleric/ench sham/monk sham/sk
__________________
| ||
|
Last edited by Troxx; 09-18-2022 at 04:05 PM..
| |||
![]() |
|
|