Shadow knight aggro

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly. You provide no counter points and just troll. Please stop. It is ok to be wrong.

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Exactly. You provide no counter points and just troll. Please stop. It is ok to be wrong.

Correction. You failed to provide any evidence that spam taunt is worth the ~5% it will actually succeed and fire at the exact moment you need it.

It’s odd that you claim 170 str is “good enough” on your monk denouncing the dps gains that would come from more str yet you think somehow that ~5% taunt chance has any actual value.

This is your fundamental flaw and it’s why you can’t win any debates. You throw random pieces of data at the wall and hope it sticks, but you simply lack the ability to formulate truly effective arguments. There’s a reason lawyers have paralegals. Leave the actual arguments for the big boys.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Correction. You failed to provide any evidence that spam taunt is worth the ~5% it will actually succeed and fire at the exact moment you need it.

It’s odd that you claim 170 str is “good enough” on your monk denouncing the dps gains that would come from more str yet you think somehow that ~5% taunt chance has any actual value.

This is your fundamental flaw and it’s why you can’t win any debates. You throw random pieces of data at the wall and hope it sticks, but you simply lack the ability to formulate truly effective arguments. There’s a reason lawyers have paralegals. Leave the actual arguments for the big boys.

I provided plenty of evidence already:

https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...&postcount=140

Simply claiming I haven't provided anything is irrelevant. It's factually incorrect. You have nothing to counter my points.

So far I am winning the debate. You simply are unable to concede or provide an argument.

You are strawmanning what I said about STR too, which is pretty common behavior from you. It's very funny that you think I am denouncing DPS gains. Comparing the pros and cons of starting stats is not denouncing DPS gains from STR lol. Its looking at which gains are better in the context of starting stats.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

So far I am winning the debate.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

I’m glad someone (other than me) finally pointed that out …

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Will DSM concede??

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Guesty07]

You were replying to Crede

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Guesty07 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You were replying to Crede

I fail to see how me replying to Crede is relevant to your question. I gave you two exmaples of posters who don't use taunt at all. You can ask them why. Clearly these players do exist.

[Guesty07]

Maybe because Crede (and most people in this thread) never said that spamming taunt is worse than NEVER PRESSING THE BUTTON AT ALL EVER.

[Snaggles]

I’ve never needed it and it was one more button to crowd my button bar. There are times I’ll use it for mez breaks but only if I don’t trust the enchanter or healer, lol.

If I did make it part of my normal routine I would personally choose to use it selectively when it is noticeably beneficial.

I have a digitial caliper I also seldom use. If I needed to chip ice for some home bartending I guess it would work for that. It wouldn’t be worse than not using it or any other makeshift tool to chip ice. Does that mean I’ll misuse a tool because it will inefficiently solve my problem? No. I’d rather just deal with generic cube ice than look, well, crazy..