As a christian.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

>>
learned
lûr′nĭd
adjective
1. Having profound, often systematic knowledge; erudite.
2. Showing or characterized by such knowledge.
3. Acquired by learning or experience.
The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th Edition.
>>

Yes but what is it?

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like to call a person who has been there for over a dozen years new.

The point is, barging into the conversation presuming everyone is an idiot, and attempting to redirect the thread topic to the idolization of Aaron Swartz is a faux pas. I don't procure information from Aaron Swartz, or the mediums by which he disseminates the knowledge he excavated. That's a completely retarded assumption and frankly, demonstrative of the very pride which I described in my posts earlier today in this thread.

Pride is the ignorance of knowledge, but it also the knowledge of the ignorant.

And if;
Pride = ignorance/knowledge and knowledge/ignorance;

Then
Ignorance is the knowledge of pride, and the pride of knowledge

And

Knowledge is the ignorance of pride, and the pride of ignorance.

[Seducio]

You tell me. What is the word learned to you? Were you taught English in school? Does your internal definition differ from the Dictionary?

I'll go with what the dictionary says thanks.

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The point is, barging into the conversation presuming everyone is an idiot, and attempting to redirect the thread topic to the idolization of Aaron Swartz is a faux pas. I don't procure information from Aaron Swartz, or the mediums by which he disseminates the knowledge he excavated. That's a completely retarded assumption and frankly, demonstrative of the very pride which I described in my posts earlier today in this thread.

Pride is the ignorance of knowledge, but it also the knowledge of the ignorant.

This is fine. Then you are living in an age that is in the past compared with me.

When we meet with regard to information you will be behind the times.

Your loss.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Landroval [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The point is, barging into the conversation presuming everyone is an idiot, and attempting to redirect the thread topic to the idolization of Aaron Swartz is a faux pas. I don't procure information from Aaron Swartz, or the mediums by which he disseminates the knowledge he excavated. That's a completely retarded assumption and frankly, demonstrative of the very pride which I described in my posts earlier today in this thread.

Pride is the ignorance of knowledge, but it also the knowledge of the ignorant.

I think he doesn't know the internet existed pre-reddit and never experienced it.

Might as well thank Al Gore.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Guy killed himself because Feds were out to get him for exposing massive corruption in Academia. I'm surprised Christians aren't more engaged in his story.

He's definitely in a bad place then, you aren't allowed to do that first part.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No. Similar reveal as to what happened to Edward Snowden. Elites don't want regular folks such as you to understand things. This is as old as time. You are acting as a post-reformation Christian that the information you have was always accessible to the rank and file. It wasn't.

My claim is Aaron didn't sacrifice himself in a Jesus-like way, rather he sacrificed himself for his ideal of 'Information wants to be Free' which is actually most likely a secular value, not sure. We are in the age of information and use that information he exposed, free access to Academic papers which were previously costly to obtain.

Whether that is good or not I don't know other than some guy I will never meet performed actions that made me smarter by giving me access to information elites historically kept to themselves.

My claim is these humans weren't suicidal they were put in a suicidal environment so a story could be told about their demise that incriminated them rather than exonerated them.

Remind you of anyone?

What shall it profit a man if (etc)?

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by aussenseiter [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I think he doesn't know the internet existed pre-reddit and never experienced it.

Might as well thank Al Gore.

The internet is made of a series of tubes. /s

That guy doesn't matter.

What matters is you.

Can you see?

Can't tell.

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by magnetaress [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Are you even so sure he killed himself?

I mentioned I'm not sure. How would I know? Assuming he did accords with the narrative that the elites are telling you. Perhaps it's true, perhaps not. Did Epstein kill himself? Don't assume the guy did

Assume the powers that be created a story to make him seem wrong. The Romans did this to Jesus prior to the Bible.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I mentioned I'm not sure. How would I know? Assuming he did accords with the narrative that the elites are telling you. Perhaps it's true, perhaps not. Did Epstein kill himself? Don't assume the guy did

Assume the powers that be created a story to make him seem wrong. The Romans did this to Jesus prior to the Bible.

Is a false Christ the same thing as an anti Christ?

Asking for a friend.