Seal Team removes ourselves from all player agreements

[Bach]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Nirgon is correct.

It would be like if the USA left the UN. The UN would no longer have authority.

Such a move isn't the end of an agreement as much as the withdrawal from the organization that requires the might of the top dog to exist in the first place.

As proven, the top doc are the GM and server owners.

If they déclare something you shut up or leave, you do not throw a temper tantrum and act like a 2 year old crybaby.

The truth is ST got away with a lot of shit stirring since green.
They thought it was the perfect opportunity to score some nobles for free since they clearly suck at it, they were probably gonna rejoint with some more demands as usual.

St do not want fair competition, because as shown with nobles, they wouldn't score much being able to use their zerg.

But they pushed too far, not only breaking UN agreement and server agreement of 72 hrs notice.

But the super dickish move if deleting the UN AND stealin open raid target from the server.

The truth is ST have shown their true color to the whole server, this is the kind of BS non sens other guild leaders had to deal with.

All those baselss justification for being a dick you see from st/dmo member in this thread, imagine that time 20 un the UN and you'll get something somewhat close to the level of toxicity.

[cd288]

Originally Posted by Bach [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

As proven, the top doc are the GM and server owners.

If they déclare something you shut up or leave, you do not throw a temper tantrum and act like a 2 year old crybaby.

The truth is ST got away with a lot of shit stirring since green.
They thought it was the perfect opportunity to score some nobles for free since they clearly suck at it, they were probably gonna rejoint with some more demands as usual.

St do not want fair competition, because as shown with nobles, they wouldn't score much being able to use their zerg.

But they pushed too far, not only breaking UN agreement and server agreement of 72 hrs notice.

But the super dickish move if deleting the UN AND stealin open raid target from the server.

The truth is ST have shown their true color to the whole server, this is the kind of BS non sens other guild leaders had to deal with.

All those baselss justification for being a dick you see from st/dmo member in this thread, imagine that time 20 un the UN and you'll get something somewhat close to the level of toxicity.

Calling someone a cry baby is a bit rich when lots of your posts are lengthy posts essentially criticizing/crying about things.

And for the record I have no affiliation with ST, I’m just making a general observation

[Bach]

Originally Posted by cd288 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Calling someone a cry baby is a bit rich when lots of your posts are lengthy posts essentially criticizing/crying about things.

And for the record I have no affiliation with ST, I’m just making a general observation

This is called a discussion, you re welcome to not take part in it.

[TripSin]

This is a video game. A video game where you refused to play nice. A video game where some of you have been engaging in ridiculous digital blackface. It sucks for you that you have to face consequences for that now.

[Seducio]

Who are you talking about?

[Seducio]

100%.

It also follows that UN is no longer a thing unless reworked into something new.

[Nirgon]

It was a UN agreement, the UN was sadly proved to be a sham with constant lobbying for rotations behind closed doors. Open raids and the UN were based on that not happening. The truth came to light and the whole agreement which everything was founded upon was nullified.

[Local]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It was a UN agreement, the UN was sadly proved to be a sham with constant lobbying for rotations behind closed doors. Open raids and the UN were based on that not happening. The truth came to light and the whole agreement which everything was founded upon was nullified.

If I'm in a bedroom and then leave the house the bedroom was in, I've still left the bedroom. 72 hours notice. This is not hard.

[Sarkhan]

Originally Posted by Nirgon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It was a UN agreement, the UN was sadly proved to be a sham with constant lobbying for rotations behind closed doors. Open raids and the UN were based on that not happening. The truth came to light and the whole agreement which everything was founded upon was nullified.

That sounds a lot like rule lawyering... "We removed UN so therefore UN agreements don't count"

I think the spirit of 72hr notice was just that, you're gonna go against your word, give 72hrs notice.
Here's what raid rules post from Blue.

"Note on Rule Lawyering – I think the spirit of everything we are trying to accomplish here is pretty clear. Anyone that tries to twist the words to support and/or justify nefarious actions will not be rewarded. There will be no “technically this could be that”, or “well it doesn’t exactly say this word for word”. From this point forward we will be actively enforcing the spirit of these rules more so than the exact letter of the law. Don't expect to skirt passed a raid suspension on a loop hole or technicality."

-- https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...d.php?t=189856

[cannobeers3]

lol