Mages are up shit’s creek I guess

[Jibartik]

Mages only have pets until 20 or 24 at which point they become research and are far to difficult to obtain by any player whatsoever.

[Obrae]

Mage was broken in the same post that dolalin guy used to break the class here you can read the evidence. Also you can read that pet only took 25% exp.

But staff here just decided to break the class

[Baler]

Is necro level 28 pet really a vendor spell?

[Obrae]

Games were not patched weekly, its a fixed they wanted to make probably even before they released the game, the dev had said the magician research wasnt fleshed out at release.

[senna]

That dolalin guy is a terrible reference and I'm shocked the devs even listen to that guy, its clear he fucking hates mages lmao

[Obrae]

Originally Posted by senna [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That dolalin guy is a terrible reference and I'm shocked the devs even listen to that guy, its clear he fucking hates mages lmao

I don't think he hates mage, he just research things out of context. Defenitly dosent know what classic everquest was like, so we cherry pick implementation of things that didnt matter cause 2 month was nothing back then.


So basically we are already passed the point when this was fixed. It was an unfinished class. and now we will drag an unfinished class way to far into progression for no reason.

[Vizax_Xaziv]

Originally Posted by Obrae [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I don't think he hates mage

He certainly has a bias against Mages. Just look at some of his posts/threads regarding the issue and you can see he takes delight in knowing that Mages got nerfed.

He also repeatedly alludes to a "surprise for Enchanters" as well - but refuses to point out that "surprise" is. Which is horseshit because I personally know of at least half a dozen Mages who have quit and/or rerolled after this thread was created.

They (we) simply wouldn't have rolled Mage had we known about this. I chose Mage over Necro specifically because I thought I would have at least one pet every spell level, with the OPTION of researching additional pets for increased utility. If I wanted to be required to research ALL my pets, I would've just rolled a Necromancer instead.

The irony there being that Necros are all-around stronger than Mages anyways. Not even mentioning the absurd power-level of Enchanters.

[oldhead]

Originally Posted by Vizax_Xaziv [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He certainly has a bias against Mages. Just look at some of his posts/threads regarding the issue and you can see he takes delight in knowing that Mages got nerfed.

He also repeatedly alludes to a "surprise for Enchanters" as well - but refuses to point out that "surprise" is. Which is horseshit because I personally know of at least half a dozen Mages who have quit and/or rerolled after this thread was created.

They (we) simply wouldn't have rolled Mage had we known about this. I chose Mage over Necro specifically because I thought I would have at least one pet every spell level, with the OPTION of researching additional pets for increased utility. If I wanted to be required to research ALL my pets, I would've just rolled a Necromancer instead.

The irony there being that Necros are all-around stronger than Mages anyways. Not even mentioning the absurd power-level of Enchanters.

I picked mage over necro cus I thought necros would be more played of the two... I was correct and now I know why.

[bwe]

Mage pets are apparently OP but enchanter charm is *kisses fingers* just right

[Danger]

if only OP had as many research pages as there are pages of mad in this thread.