Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[PlsNoBan]

I generally find obsessively copy pasting the same bullshit over and over kind of tiring. I have done it myself so I can't talk shit. Mostly reminding DSM how he contradicted himself them tried to backpedal and deflect. But I can't say I disagree with much of anything cyxthryth has said. He understands how full of shit DSM is like everyone else does. There's only been 1 or 2 VQ guildies or DSM family members posting occasionally in support of anything he's posted (over 900 times btw)

[Karanis]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM attempted to move the goalposts by bringing a 5th "pocket" character into his "arguments" (even though this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument) pertaining to the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" discussion.

Of course - speaking strictly mathematically - 4=/=5, so it is unclear why DSM has attempted to bring this 5th character into the equation or why his posts would seem to indicate that believes doing so is not an example of him moving goalposts - when it objectively is - hehe.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I concur, reading cyxthryth's posts and watching DSM blatantly ignore them has brought me the most enjoyment in this thread. This is due to the fact that everything he says are objective truths, whereas everything DSM says is an opinion, so there's really no way for DSM to refute anything he says. Cyxthryth's is just playing this forum logic chess game better than DSM. I think we should all stop responding so they can actually attempt to have a civil discussion, since DSM's constant ignores have forced him to go strictly into quoting mode.

You always conveniently forget that every other poster has been ignoring him. It isn't a valid argument. You simply stopped ignoring him to double down on your https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum argument. It's clear in the post history lol.

It means the trolls are getting desperate though, turning to someone they used to ignore themselves.

[PlsNoBan]

Should we plan some kind of celebration for DSM's inevitable 1000th post in this idiot thread?

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You always conveniently forget that every other poster has been ignoring him. It isn't a valid argument. You simply stopped ignoring him to double down on your https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum argument. It's clear in the post history lol.

It means the trolls are getting desperate though, turning to someone they used to ignore themselves.

I never once ignored him. As he stated, he has directed all of his posts at you, and had he directed anything at me, I gladly would have responded. I've 100% agreed with everything he says, you're honestly just afraid to engage him in direct discussion, lol.

Also, you are very incorrect in calling my argument Argumentum ad populum. I've advocated since page 1 that this 4 man group should be enchanter/cleric/mage/necro, which has been much less popular than some of the other compositions.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I never once ignored him. As he stated, he has directed all of his posts at you, and had he directed anything at me, I gladly would have responded. I've 100% agreed with everything he says, you're honestly just afraid to engage him in direct discussion, lol.

You have barely posted here. That doesn't mean anything. The vast majority of posters have ignored everything his said throughout the thread. That hasn't changed. It isn't like you posting now has changed the post history.

He is ignored by everybody because his posts are nonsensical. I am not the only one doing it.

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have barely posted here. That doesn't mean anything. The vast majority of posters have ignored everything his said throughout the thread. That hasn't changed. It isn't like you coming here has changed the post history.

To ignore would mean to refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally.

We've all acknowledged & noticed his posts. There would be no way for us to disregard them intentionally, because they have all been directed at you.

So no, nobody has ignored what he has had to say, I would gladly respond if he wasn't directing 100% of his posts at you.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Crede [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

To ignore would mean to refuse to take notice of or acknowledge; disregard intentionally.

We've all acknowledged & noticed his posts. There would be no way for us to disregard them intentionally, because they have all been directed at you.

So no, nobody has ignored what he has had to say, I would gladly respond if he wasn't directing 100% of his posts at you.

You can look at the post history. If people were noticing his posts, they would have responded to at least one of them lol. This was only done recently when he changed his nonsense posting tactics, which still don't make sense.

Again, this is simply desperation because you only have the number of users on your side, not facts and logic. Hence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum . If you want to have a discussion about what I have posted, please use what I have said, not the straw men that have been created by users like Cyxthryth.

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Should we plan some kind of celebration for DSM's inevitable 1000th post in this idiot thread?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

We don't have long for planning. Maybe we can all sign a jpeg of an ogre shaman root rotting adds in a group? I'd say to include the pocket cleric but it'd obviously be logged out for the screenshot

[Crede]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can look at the post history. If people were noticing his posts, they would have responded to at least one of them lol. This was only done recently when he changed his nonsense posting tactics, which still don't make sense.

Again, this is simply desperation because you only have the number of users on your side, not facts and logic. Hence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum . If you want to have a discussion about what I have posted, please use what I have said, not the straw men that have been created by users like Cyxthryth.

I'm not sure why this is so hard for you to comprehend.

Nobody is responding to his posts because they were all directed at you. What part of that is not clear to you?

He simply resorted to quoting the state of your discussion, because you refused to continue to engage him in discussion, despite the fact that you've engaged everyone else in discussion.

Had he directed at least 1 post at someone else, or implied he was willing to have a discussion, we would have. We've all noticed him, and agreed with him. You don't need to respond to someone to notice them, lol.

Unfortunately you are the only one ignoring, since you are deliberately choosing to not respond to his posts directed at you.