NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[unsunghero]

To play devil’s advocate though, YouTube has been very accommodating regarding allowing conservatives to still have a platform there to talk shit about provocative shit about the gov’t, things like black culture’s impact on crime, even negatives about trans. They really only come down on content creators who continue to insult particular trans people like Dylan

Like Matt Walsh probably could have continued to misgender Dylan forever with no consequence, it wasn’t until he made multiple videos insulting Dylan with pretty harsh words that he finally got banned (temp) for harassment

This is why I will come clean and say I actually feel comfortable with paying for ad free YouTube. I stream all my music on there, and watch a shitload of videos. I have been relatively satisfied with them as a company, so as of now I don’t have any personal issues with giving them my business

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Trexller [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

lol white people

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I'm sorry you are afraid of everything Trexller, but that isn't my fault. You wouldn't set foot in a confederate county and you know it

[Origen]

That reads like "I acknowledge Youtube allows hate speech, that's why I am comfortable giving them my money."

Google's goal is to sow division in the class war while making a profit, just like a bunch of other organizations that do the bidding of the billionaires.

[Ooloo]

Criticizing trans people is not hate speech.

[Origen]

The way I see conservatives doing it online sure is, you're a great example of how normalized hate speech is among online conservatives.

[Origen]

I'm not gonna argue about that crap all day, if you are wondering if given words are hate speech, ask if you'd stand on a soap box and say it in a crowd of the people you are referring to.

There's a reason you reactionary types are wise enough to limit your real thoughts to the internet, where your anonymity protects you.

[Toxigen]

Questioning the mental health of someone who wants to cut their dick off isn't hate speech lol.

[Origen]

You're not a psychologist, you're the assistant manager of a Dollar Tree, Toxigen. You literally endorse fascism because you are so terrified of black people, so, I'm just gonna ignore your shallow thoughts on trans people

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I suspect they don't want watchers to push and already depressed content maker to consider hurting themselves. Nor do they want to cater to that type of cry for help trend.

5. Sidetrack opponents with name calling and ridicule. This is also known as the primary “attack the messenger” ploy, though other methods qualify as variants of that approach. Associate opponents with unpopular titles such as “kooks”, “right-wing”, “liberal”, “left-wing”, “terrorists”, “conspiracy buffs”, “radicals”, “militia”, “racists”, “religious fanatics”, “sexual deviants”, and so forth. This makes others shrink from support out of fear of gaining the same label, and you avoid dealing with issues


12. Enigmas that have no solution. Drawing upon the overall umbrella of events surrounding the crime and the multitude of players and events, paint the entire affair as too complex to solve. This causes those otherwise following the matter to begin to lose interest more quickly without having to address the actual issues

18. Emotionalize, antagonize, and goad opponents. If you can’t do anything else, chide and taunt your opponents and draw them into emotional responses which will tend to make them look foolish and overly motivated, and generally render their material somewhat less coherent.
Not only will you avoid discussing the issues in the first instance, but even if their emotional response addresses the issue, you can further avoid the issues by then focusing on how “sensitive they are to criticism”.


22. Manufacture a new truth. Create your own expert(s), group(s), author(s), leader(s) or influence existing ones willing to forge new ground via scientific, investigative, or social research or testimony which concludes favorably. In this way, if you must actually address issues, you can do so authoritatively.

[Landroval]

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You're not a psychologist, you're the assistant manager of a Dollar Tree, Toxigen. You literally endorse fascism because you are so terrified of black people, so, I'm just gonna ignore your shallow thoughts on trans people

It requires a retarded girl pursuing 7 years of sociology classes, which are just a bunch of retards agreeing with each other, to know the proper stance on chopping ones dick off.

Oh no, Emile Durkheim warned us about this!