Proposition For Raid Rules - Input Requested

[radditsu]

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

What about a percentage bonus? Lets say two guilds want to team up and kill, say, Severilous. Both guilds get loot and both guilds get charged their points for killing sev. But, next week, because they worked together, both guilds are allocated an extra 25 points to spend because of goodwill. So if they joined raided each week, a guild could stay at a 125 point raid limit. Again, example numbers, but you see what I mean.

I specifially mean open roll raids. /shout Opem naggy raid pst to dude for more info. I subtracted 2 naggys and a vox a month out of the raid total for this... if you want to organize a talendor or whatever..thats on you

[Yinikren]

I like the points costs that Autotune has come up with, they are similar to mine and for the same reasons.

[Yinikren]

And the doubling points costs is an interesting idea as well. I am liking this.

For points costs on tola, planes, drusilla, chardok royals, etc - no. Their spawn times by default means they can't be monopolized. Drusilla isn't even a raid target goobers. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[radditsu]

Planar guilds are raids. But not competiton. Nobody races to fear to get those darn frightfingers! Those can and should be dictated by your guild.

[Tegellan]

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Planar guilds are raids. But not competiton. Nobody races to fear to get those darn frightfingers! Those can and should be dictated by your guild.

I think you mean No one races ANYMORE. because guilds move on..

the problem is Velious never came out so we coudl not "Move on yet"

[radditsu]

I like monthly. I think it adds more gamesmanship quality. And the variance spikes would even out better.



And just because us nerds are talking about it ddoesn't mean it is getting any support by the guilds ^_^

[Troubled]

Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I like monthly. I think it adds more gamesmanship quality. And the variance spikes would even out better.



And just because us nerds are talking about it ddoesn't mean it is getting any support by the guilds ^_^

I like monthly too. Adjustment of points possibly needed. Also, rep of BDA here, "casual" nerd reporting in.

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am sure most guilds will jump at the opportunity just to raid - if FE and TMO want to spend half of their alloted points each week on VS then that's just fewer mobs they are taking each week as a result.

Not looking for scraps or what they're willing to hand out. Looking for fair server-wide opportunity amongst all raid-capable guilds.

[Ravager]

Originally Posted by Troubled [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Not looking for scraps or what they're willing to hand out. Looking for fair server-wide opportunity amongst all raid-capable guilds.

Don't forget a point of entry for up and coming guilds.

[Yinikren]

I am sure most guilds will jump at the opportunity just to raid - if FE and TMO want to spend half of their alloted points each week on VS then that's just fewer mobs they are taking each week as a result.

[Yinikren]

This system does seem to have a lot of support - details just need to be hammered out and everyone needs to agree on how it should be run. Literally the only things it needs to get started are a raid forum to decide on points costs for mobs. We can also push for the removal or reduction of variance with we can procure enough evidence that it would no longer help the server.