Global ooc - what's the hold up? - Page 27

steakshop · #**261** 03-21-2012, 01:32 PM

troll

hagard · #**262** 03-21-2012, 11:28 PM

Global ooc

Keegan · #**263** 03-22-2012, 12:53 AM

Global /ooc on VZTZ was a cesspool that consisted of shit like ******FAGGOT******FAGGOT constantly. Tell me I'm wrong.

That being said, I think global ooc is probably a good thing but ONLY if you opt-in. You should have to choose to listen to the bullshit, not choose to ignore it.

inc bmw/tattoo/plasticassholes responses. Go NOW.

Tradesonred · #**264** 03-22-2012, 01:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keegan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Global /ooc on VZTZ was a cesspool that consisted of shit like ******FAGGOT******FAGGOT constantly. Tell me I'm wrong.

That being said, I think global ooc is probably a good thing but ONLY if you opt-in. You should have to choose to listen to the bullshit, not choose to ignore it.

inc bmw/tattoo/plasticassholes responses. Go NOW.

Right, global OOC if put in, should be off by default cuz im sure itll be like whats just been quoted.

Also, if yellow text is put in, it should not reveal the location of the kill.

Aenor · #**265** 03-22-2012, 02:41 AM

Yes ooc in vztz was a cesspool... I simply put the attention seekers on ignore. Opt in is a great idea but I guess it doesn't matter since Rogean is resistant to the idea in general. Server is done.

Harrison · #**266** 03-22-2012, 08:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aenor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

vztz was a cesspool...Server is done.

Yes, yes it is. VZTZ is dead and any suggestions to bring Red99 to the grave with it, are rightfully ignored.

Palemoon · #**267** 03-22-2012, 09:06 AM

Why would non trolls think global OOC on THIS server would be a good idea? Check out rants and flames here, filled with hate and bigotry and constant 24/7 trolling. This is what global /ooc would be and it would only bring back/keep the worse elements of online gameing internet-wide to continue messing up the red99 server.

And that is not even getting into the in-game reasons for not having it, like loseing tactical advantages by opting out of it, break down of in-game immersion, not classic, etc.etc.

Horrible idea and it never needs to see the light of day.

SearyxTZ · #**268** 03-22-2012, 09:43 AM

Palemoon, Harrison: You seem to be lost - the blue server is that way.

thanks for your opinion though, unfortunately, it does not reflect the poll results at all (or people who actually played on live red servers, play on this one, etc)

Thanks, though. We appreciate it.

Hovis · #**269** 03-22-2012, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SearyxTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Palemoon, Harrison: You seem to be lost - the blue server is that way.

thanks for your opinion though, unfortunately, it does not reflect the poll results at all (or people who actually played on live red servers, play on this one, etc)

Thanks, though. We appreciate it.

+1

Kringe · #**270** 03-22-2012, 09:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SearyxTZ [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Palemoon, Harrison: You seem to be lost - the blue server is that way.

thanks for your opinion though, unfortunately, it does not reflect the poll results at all (or people who actually played on live red servers, play on this one, etc)

Thanks, though. We appreciate it.

+1 Plus former GMs/Guides shouldnt be allowed to give their advice... Kthx - The community might think one in said guild would have too much influence.