The insurrection hoax is over

[Jobaber]

Originally Posted by Horza [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

still going with the paste eater narrative that Biden somehow made Putler invade

you heard it straight from trumps mouth, they never would have if he was in charge.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Jobaber [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

you heard it straight from trumps mouth, they never would have if he was in charge.

Trump told putin that if he invades ukraine we would nuke moscow. And lo and behold, they didn't invade.

Biden meanwhile goes "yeah if you kinda invade we won't do shit" and they instantly invaded.

Gosh guys I can't figure this out!

[Horza]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Trump told putin that if he invades ukraine we would nuke moscow. And lo and behold, they didn't invade.

Biden meanwhile goes "yeah if you kinda invade we won't do shit" and they instantly invaded.

Gosh guys I can't figure this out!

That's not what Trump said recently on Fox, he said he'd happily cede territory to Putler because when you get right down to it he's another bootlicker just like the rest of you GOPtards.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Patrece [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Check out the J6 Wikipedia page and look what they try to present as facts (even more of a lol now that we've seen some of the tapes the Dems/uniparty Kinzinger+Cheney types wanted to hide)

"The Guardian" and "The Atlantic" etc? Lmao

I'd strongly advise anyone to start questioning recorded history after going through it

We are being lied to, not by Orange Man

Wikipedia is sadly a shell of what it was supposed to be, and even what it actually once was. It's just *another* PR wing for democrats and the left if you look up literally any issue or personality that is even remotely controversial. They are utterly untalented hacks pretending to be unbiased record keepers, it's pathetic.

[Basanos]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Wikipedia is sadly a shell of what it was supposed to be, and even what it actually once was. It's just *another* PR wing for democrats and the left if you look up literally any issue or personality that is even remotely controversial. They are utterly untalented hacks pretending to be unbiased record keepers, it's pathetic.

That pesky liberal bias of "real life" is a hell of a thing, isn't it?

Have you tried not having beliefs that permit fascism to prosper?

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Basanos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That pesky liberal bias of "real life" is a hell of a thing, isn't it?

Have you tried not having beliefs that permit fascism to prosper?

No it's more like the complete absence of journalistic integrity that any 9th grader learns in social studies.

The article on george floyd literally opens by referring to him as a man who was "murdered". There is no representation of the counter argument, which is, ya know, the fact that there's absolutely zero evidence that derek chauvin intended to kill him. Which is, ya know, the definition of murder.

Pesky details like what words actually mean are apparently a major obstacle for wikipedia.

[aussenseiter]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it's more like the complete absence of journalistic integrity that any 9th grader learns in social studies.

The article on george floyd literally opens by referring to him as a man who was "murdered". There is no representation of the counter argument, which is, ya know, the fact that there's absolutely zero evidence that derek chauvin intended to kill him. Which is, ya know, the definition of murder.

Pesky details like what words actually mean are apparently a major obstacle for wikipedia.

It's murder because the court said it's murder. Rule of law, not rule of men.

[Basanos]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it's more like the complete absence of journalistic integrity that any 9th grader learns in social studies.

The article on george floyd literally opens by referring to him as a man who was "murdered". There is no representation of the counter argument, which is, ya know, the fact that there's absolutely zero evidence that derek chauvin intended to kill him. Which is, ya know, the definition of murder.

Pesky details like what words actually mean are apparently a major obstacle for wikipedia.

Journalistic integrity is expected in Wikipedia?

Hell I barely went to pretend college and even I know it's not an acceptable source for anything in academics

You may as well whine about the "liberal bias" of reddit dot com

[Ekco]

Wikipedia turning into propaganda makes me feel way less bad about quite literally never donating to them.

(lol)

Originally Posted by Basanos [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That pesky liberal bias of "real life" is a hell of a thing, isn't it?

oh the irony.

[Basanos]

Don't get mad at me, I can talk about my beliefs openly without fear of getting my face smashed in. Unlike fascists.

Ooloo isn't stupid, he's just full of shit