![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
God Bless Texas
Free Iran | |||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
This is a serious question did you vote for Bush twice? By the way the parties flipped case and point. Explain that. | |||
|
#3
|
||||
|
Quote:
Back in the day this counter-culture would be a mowhawk and bracelet-with-metal-studs wearing punk saying “F the man!”. This is now us, but I’m not into the look. Or the music lol | |||
|
#4
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
This means that she technically doesn’t know if she is a woman. Therefore she shouldn’t have been eligible for the “black, female” requirement. If she doesn’t know what a woman is, and has a higher education level than Joe Biden, then he also shouldn’t be qualified to pick a woman for the Supreme Court Also, if the Supreme Court cannot determine what a woman is, then all women-centered legal programs should be thrown out This is getting really funny. Watch the dictionary and scientific community rush to change 1000+ years of science ahead of the upcoming debates. They have a time limit to do it, because “what is a woman?” is for sure going to come up as a debate question | |||
|
#6
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#7
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
#10
|
|||
|
libs using social media to censor Reality
| ||
![]() |
|
|