![]() |
|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
Quote:
So basically arguing to convince no one
__________________
Nexii Vanadis <Gravity> | Nexii's Erotic Adventures
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#2
|
||||
|
Quote:
Imagine claiming video games are won. | |||
|
|
||||
|
#4
|
|||
|
This thread keeps getting bumped. It had a good title: It's official! This conveys exciting new information. It's official, mom jeans are hot again! Stuff like that. Imagine if every month Teen Vogue printed the same cover story with the same headline. You'd probably stop buying their magazine and maybe question if they were lying to you.
| ||
|
|
|||
|
#5
|
||||
|
Quote:
| |||
|
|
||||
|
#6
|
|||
|
To be fair to samoht dain is mentioned, at the very end, 3 years after the post he tries to cite as proof that there's some kind of rule against lull pulling (there isn't). To be fair to you he is a really dense moron.
What he's asking everyone in this thread to do is focus on 1 sentence and remove all context with which it was posted and ignore the thread it was posted in. That's not how language works and that's not how reading works. Context is king and in this case samoht is a lowly court jester. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#7
|
|||
|
Two response from two different idiots. One refuses to read the page they copy/pasted, and the other acknowledges that it does include dain specific rules, but still will not concede that the thread includes dain specific rules.
This is why nobody can get along with Riot. They're full of this kind of rules lawyer who are absolutely wrong in their rules lawyering, but they refuse to even acknowledge that they might be wrong. These people clearly cannot be reasoned with. They are a blight to the server and need to be removed from the raid scene. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
| ||||
|
|
|||||
|
#9
|
|||
|
Samoht, in his wormtongued argument believes that the removal of one rule "06-14-21 update: Removed max runners for Kael/Dain" applies.
And Samoht argues that the removal of rules " 6/16/2017 Removed all ToV, Tormax, and Statue rules." does not apply. This is two-faced, and part of Trainquish's MO. | ||
|
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
Wait, so does the thread include dain rules or not?
Because your entire argument was that it did not. Are you acknowledging your argument was a farse? | ||
|
|
|||
![]() |
|
|