religion

[Eliseus]

Oh, even more funny, you idiots say to google stuff with debunked, but when you google evolution debunked, no artciles are valid, but if I do something like God debunked, all those articles would be valid correct? You preach stuff you don't even follow yourself. You prove your ignorance because you guys only listen to your voice of reasoning, if it isn't on your side it is wrong, period. That is why I pointed out that nothing I say matters, because it will be denied anyways. I specifically already gave examples EXACTLY to the criteria your buds give, but now apparently it's not valid, because it was against what you guys were hoping for.

Basically, you guys are hypocrites, you only want taught what you want taught, or only want to hear what you want to hear. It is human nature to want the facts, but most of peoples responses against you have been that science doesn't have all the facts, that is why it is theories and not fact. Just because someone peer-reviews something you do and agrees with it doesn't necessarily make it fact. Yet you live a life full of fabrications that aren't "religious", but "religious" people aren't aloud to preach their fabrications. I know I'm just repeating myself again, and again, and you still won't get it, and you will respond with the same exact thing over and over again just as I would, and we get to have the next 47 pages of the same thing that is the first 47 pages.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Oh, even more funny, you idiots say to google stuff with debunked, but when you google evolution debunked, no artciles are valid, but if I do something like God debunked, all those articles would be valid correct? You preach stuff you don't even follow yourself. You prove your ignorance because you guys only listen to your voice of reasoning, if it isn't on your side it is wrong, period. That is why I pointed out that nothing I say matters, because it will be denied anyways. I specifically already gave examples EXACTLY to the criteria your buds give, but now apparently it's not valid, because it was against what you guys were hoping for.

Basically, you guys are hypocrites, you only want taught what you want taught, or only want to hear what you want to hear. It is human nature to want the facts, but most of peoples responses against you have been that science doesn't have all the facts, that is why it is theories and not fact. Just because someone peer-reviews something you do and agrees with it doesn't necessarily make it fact. Yet you live a life full of fabrications that aren't "religious", but "religious" people aren't aloud to preach their fabrications. I know I'm just repeating myself again, and again, and you still won't get it, and you will respond with the same exact thing over and over again just as I would, and we get to have the next 47 pages of the same thing that is the first 47 pages.

Every debunk has a rebuttal. Each side has a unique way of addressing the counter arguments. Unfortunately for you, "well the Bible says" holds no weight and only hurts your stance.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Every debunk has a rebuttal. Each side has a unique way of addressing the counter arguments. Unfortunately for you, "well the Bible says" holds no weight and only hurts your stance.

Uhh what.

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Uhh what.

Like I said earlier, most of this is above you. I'm trying to teach you but you need to be willing to learn.

[Eliseus]

Actually, I think Kagatob is onto something, more and more the Bible is being proven to have historically correct info, but Kagatob has seen evolution in motion, and claims the Bible is incorrect, therefore Kagatob has been around forever?

[KagatobLuvsAnimu]

Originally Posted by Eliseus [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

more and more the Bible is being proven to have historically correct info.

Examples please. From my perspective there's barely anything left in the book that's even remotely plausible.

[Eliseus]

Originally Posted by KagatobLuvsAnimu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Examples please. From my perspective there's barely anything left in the book that's even remotely plausible.

I don't need too, you have been around forever, please enlighten me on the accuracy and evolution.

[paulgiamatti]

But it does me no injury for my neighbor to say that there are twenty gods, or no God. It neither picks my pocket, nor breaks my leg.

Look, I don't care who wants to believe in what, I really don't. If you want to dismiss evolution and the work that's been put into it, that's fine. If you want to be a monotheist, a polytheist, an omnitheist, knock yourself out. If you want to broadcast this to everyone, that's also fine - at least then we'll know what and how you think.

I can say with certainty though that you won't be getting into our schools. The intellectual community is on our side, and absolutely no apology needs to be made for the teaching of evolution. Any suggestion of such is the death of thought and simply anti-intellectual. If you want something to change, you go do the work. You come up with something tangible and credible to discredit evolutionary biology.

[Glenzig]

Originally Posted by paulgiamatti [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Look, I don't care who wants to believe in what, I really don't. If you want to dismiss evolution and the work that's been put into it, that's fine. If you want to be a monotheist, a polytheist, an omnitheist, knock yourself out. If you want to broadcast this to everyone, that's also fine - at least then we'll know what and how you think.

I can say with certainty though that you won't be getting into our schools. The intellectual community is on our side, and absolutely no apology needs to be made for the teaching of evolution. Any suggestion of such is the death of thought and simply anti-intellectual. If you want something to change, you go do the work. You come up with something tangible and credible to discredit evolutionary biology.

[B]Your[B] schools? Evolutionists own the school system now? Why do I have to pay taxes on it then?

[paulgiamatti]

Did I say "my schools"? Do I really need to quote myself?