OFFICIAL PROPOSAL from FE/TMO

[Yinikren]

Originally Posted by Hitpoint [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You must have missed the part where maestro/tal/gore/draco are unavailable to us for the other 3 weeks. Or that we're going to be splitting those priority targets across 3 guilds, probably 4 once BDA or taken cleans up on the first week. I find it hard to imagine that one of those guilds wont end up killing 40%.

That's the part I giggled the most, and that was also the first order of contention when someone WHO MADE THE AGREEMENT WITH YOU decided it would probably be better to put more mobs in that pile.

I've said before, fixing the server for a week isn't fixing the server at all.

Time to go bump my own useful thread.

[JayN]

Originally Posted by jaybone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you dont mind me asking what upgrade do you need and what do you have currently.

the only good item off him

BCG

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by jaybone [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you dont mind me asking what upgrade do you need and what do you have currently.

BCG.

[Lazie]

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I have no issues with compromise (see my unbiased post) but I think its absolutely hilarious that TMO and FE can "cut their losses" on 25% of the mobs they would normally take to divide amongst the rest of the server, then peddle their idea as the epitome of fairness.

What you don't seem to get is... TMO/FE-IB compete with each other. A guild in that competition could get less mobs a month with this arrangement than say a BDA or Taken. For Example Say BDA and Taken continue to kill Vox and Inny regularly as they were before. Then both those guilds split Gore and Talendor on the non priority list. THEN they get a week of uncontested competition on Trak/VS/FAY/SEV/CT/INNY/Vox/Naggy.

Taken or BDA could end up with more kills than FE-IB or TMO depending how the competition goes between those 2 guilds in a particular month. Now as I said I don't think this goes far enough but you guys saying it isn't fair are blind...A guild could get more kills in a month than one of those 2 with this system. I however would like to see a system that gives guilds that aren't hardcore and hasn't killed anything before more of an opportunity at a mob. Dunno if we will ever see it however.

[toosweet]

Hi, I never put in the effort but im here for my welfare check and obama phone.
Sincerely
Casual scum guild--we deserve it!

[Yinikren]

Originally Posted by Durka [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That was my concern. No way to really track legitimacy of new guilds that spring up as a result of this...

Plenty of ways to track the legitimacy of a new guild appearing our of nowhere.

This is why a weekly point system would work wonders.

[JayN]

only way i see pleasing casuals is no competition at all; instances please with lock out timers

[Hailto]

Originally Posted by Yinikren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Time to go bump my own useful thread.

Goodluck with that.

[Obrae]

I think its a great proposal and the council will ensure that all details are ironed out and in time the agreement gets better for everyone.

[Yinikren]

Originally Posted by Hailto [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Goodluck with that.

Thanks friend!