Why is training allowed on p99 in veeshan's peak? (poll asking your opinion)

[Nirgon]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

I'll give you that one.

[Sarius]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

I really don't see how you can have one rule and not the other. Makes no sense whatsoever. So if you were to keep training them so they cannot loot the mob and the loots rot, that is ok? If you loot the mob with 1 second left on timer and nobody from killing guild anywhere near it, that's ninja looting?

[timhutton]

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I really don't see how you can have one rule and not the other. Makes no sense whatsoever. So if you were to keep training them so they cannot loot the mob and the loots rot, that is ok? If you loot the mob with 1 second left on timer and nobody from killing guild anywhere near it, that's ninja looting?

Yes.

[getsome]

Originally Posted by Sarius [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I really don't see how you can have one rule and not the other. Makes no sense whatsoever. So if you were to keep training them so they cannot loot the mob and the loots rot, that is ok? If you loot the mob with 1 second left on timer and nobody from killing guild anywhere near it, that's ninja looting?

No.

[Fazlazen]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

Oh is that the story of when Zeelot shit on your entire guild Getsome? [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Rhuma7]

Originally Posted by getsome [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

A long time ago in a galaxy far far away, we were told VP had no GM involvement. In those very early days, TMO killed a VP dragon. After the VP dragon was dead IB killed all the TMO survivors. IB was ready to delete the loots on the dead dragon. Then out of thin air Rogean appeared and ruled VP did have rules and that IB would suffer consequences if we looted the dead dragon's corpse who we were now standing over with no TMO in zone. This was a guild on guild event.

I am merely providing everyone pro or con with context regarding a decision made by the head man in charge during the very early days of VP.

VP doesn't have rules til it doesnt benefit TMO OR stupid ass rule is cool until it shows how fucking stupid it is.

[getsome]

Are you the same person who begged us to let you have vox after you had not gotten one mob on a server reset? And then after we left you and your raid force got ported out for being above level 52+ and we came in with our alts to kill it?

[kotton05]

I keep goin thru vp and it's empty. I Like the new mechanics and pathing.

I'm for training. Made a few friends during it, not sure about enemies>_<

[kotton05]

chain pulled nexona thru walls in hopes of killing our clerics once we got to that lil spot in the sky... before that rule changed.

[Tasslehofp99]

Originally Posted by kotton05 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

chain pulled nexona thru walls in hopes of killing our clerics once we got to that lil spot in the sky... before that rule changed.

There is a fraps of this around somewhere, Zapatos was the one who recorded it I believe. Either way, Training is not classic. Has no place in raiding scene, and needs to be removed asap.

It's not competitive, its lame as fuck.