Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > Class Discussions > Tanks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #261  
Old 11-15-2023, 07:07 AM
Videri Videri is offline
Planar Protector

Videri's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 2,861
Default

You want your guildmates to have level 60 warriors to tank raid mobs with Defensive so you can loot the items.

You carry them through group content so they can allow you to beat raid content.
Reply With Quote
  #262  
Old 11-15-2023, 07:13 AM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 650
Default

In that sense, yes.

In the sense of trying to maximise efficiency, strength and safety for a small group that may be a PuG? No.

So, that just proves Ya.dingus right: Warriors are a charity case outside of raids.
Reply With Quote
  #263  
Old 11-15-2023, 09:28 AM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,649
Default

Group content isn’t hard. On blue often there are only like 350 players online. Yet we frequently propose the scenario where two tanks want to join our group at the exact same moment? Lol.

Here is a tip: Fill your stupid groups quickly and get grinding. Pick competent people who aren’t annoying. Also, if anyone is afraid to invite a warrior into the group it probably says more about their own ability or those around them. Bring a charged cap if you join that group or better yet, just solo.
Reply With Quote
  #264  
Old 11-15-2023, 09:35 AM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 650
Default

Nobody said they can't or won't invite a warrior.

They're/I'm just saying it's not the most optimal. That may not matter to you much, but it is at least a slight factor to consider.

Notice how, in my hypothetical scenario, I said if it was my personal choice if I had both a Warrior and Paladin to play with, in close to equal gear, I would pick a Paladin? They just bring more to the table.

If you know a very well geared and smart Warrior who is willing to be the tank, and if you're willing to make up for their shortcomings, go ahead and pick them.
Reply With Quote
  #265  
Old 11-15-2023, 10:20 AM
Botten Botten is offline
Planar Protector

Botten's Avatar

Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gloomlord [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
In that sense, yes.

In the sense of trying to maximise efficiency, strength and safety for a small group that may be a PuG? No.

So, that just proves Ya.dingus right: Warriors are a charity case outside of raids.
Not at all and picking and choosing the post to respond to given the numerous posts saying otherwise is just pushing off the valid statements that warriors are still best.
Reply With Quote
  #266  
Old 11-15-2023, 10:29 AM
Gloomlord Gloomlord is offline
Fire Giant

Gloomlord's Avatar

Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 650
Default

You apologists are completely impermeable to reason.

DSM can't admit Shaman has worse DPS than a Magician, and you can't admit Warriors are not "the best" in small group content.
Reply With Quote
  #267  
Old 11-15-2023, 10:31 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is online now
Planar Protector

Toxigen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,349
Default

I duo'd with a shaman mostly on my war and zerked the whole way to 60. Eashen 2 hander absolutely insane dps can confirm. No way would a knight keep up with that.
__________________
ENC | MNK | WAR | ROG | CLR | DRU | SHM | NEC | PAL | BRD
Reply With Quote
  #268  
Old 11-15-2023, 11:16 AM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,649
Default

I’m glad it’s taken 27 pages to conclude a knight might be optimal at tanking casual content. It’s basically the crux of the first post of this stupid thread. No, in normal situations warriors don’t do substantially more dps than knights. No, epics won’t fix all a warriors aggro problems with 30 second fights.

If a warrior needs to believe they are the best tank for all situations they are sorely mistaken but likely won’t accept the fact.

If a knight feels warriors have no place with group content because someone else might occasionally get hit. Same thing.

If you are in seb and not wearing kunark gear it shouldn’t be challenging. Just fill the “tank” roll with anyone and move on.
Reply With Quote
  #269  
Old 11-15-2023, 11:19 AM
Snaggles Snaggles is offline
Planar Protector


Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 2,649
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Toxigen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
I duo'd with a shaman mostly on my war and zerked the whole way to 60. Eashen 2 hander absolutely insane dps can confirm. No way would a knight keep up with that.
No kidding. A few asterisks to that though.

Frankly, managing zerk health is probably more annoying than doing less dps. That and the warrior losing their mind every time they get a huge crip would be tiring.
Reply With Quote
  #270  
Old 11-15-2023, 11:22 AM
Toxigen Toxigen is online now
Planar Protector

Toxigen's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 4,349
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snaggles [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
No kidding. A few asterisks to that though.

Frankly, managing zerk health is probably more annoying than doing less dps. That and the warrior losing their mind every time they get a huge crip would be tiring.
idk my shaman bud seemed to enjoy it...those 1k+ crips were spicy

joining 5-6 man pugs is for the birds anyway...turns to shit XP because of bloat and laziness...only exception was when the Hole first received that massive ZEM boost...all the sweaties came out for that
__________________
ENC | MNK | WAR | ROG | CLR | DRU | SHM | NEC | PAL | BRD
Last edited by Toxigen; 11-15-2023 at 11:25 AM..
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:52 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.