Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Please show me the level 60 camp that is pulling more than 20 mobs in a 30 minute respawn cycle, but is too difficult for a Shaman to root/rot. That isn't Sebilis, so you need to think of another place.

It's not about being too difficult to root rot. It's the fact that root rotting in groups is retarded. Just get a class that does better DPS in a normal fashion. Root rotting is a solo tactic.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It's not about being too difficult to root rot. It's the fact that root rotting in groups is retarded. Just get a class that does better DPS in a normal fashion. Root rotting is a solo tactic.

That is just your opinion. Your opinion does not dictate how everybody must play. If you cared about DPS, you would let your group DPS.

I cannot believe you keep arguing that DPS is always worth it, but somehow root/rotting in groups (to increase DPS) is not worth it.

It is contradictory.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is just your opinion. Your opinion does not dictate how everybody must play. If you cared about DPS, you would let your group DPS.

I cannot believe you keep arguing that DPS is always worth it, but somehow root/rotting in groups (to increase DPS) is not worth it.

It is contradictory.

This discussion is not about "how everybody must play", nor is it about what you can or cannot believe, so I am not sure what point you think you are making or what fact you think you are refuting, and since this discussion is - again - not about "how everybody must play" or what you can or cannot believe, the above Quote is simply an example of yet another irrelevant post from you.

This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[PlsNoBan]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

That is just your opinion. Your opinion does not dictate how everybody must play. If you cared about DPS, you would let your group DPS.

I cannot believe you keep arguing that DPS is always worth it, but somehow root/rotting in groups (to increase DPS) is not worth it.

It is contradictory.

Lol alright man you win. Shaman is the best ever for everything. Root rotting adds in groups isn't retarded at all. Healing full hp targets is beneficial. More DPS is irrelevant. Warriors solo better than enchanters. You were right about all of it all along.

[PlsNoBan]

"Best group in EverQuest is Shaman Shaman Shaman Shaman Shaman Shadowknight" - DSM

[PlsNoBan]

I guess one way to win arguments is refusing to give up and being so annoyingly obtuse that everyone else gives up talking to you. Not my preferred strategy but it's effective if you're willing to post complete bullshit over 1000 times like a psychopath

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess one way to win arguments is refusing to give up and being so annoyingly obtuse that everyone else gives up talking to you. Not my preferred strategy but it's effective if you're willing to post complete bullshit over 1000 times like a psychopath

Perhaps such behavior may indeed be a way to "win" arguments (I cannot quantify this since DSM has yet to provide the definition for "win" that he is using) but it is certainly not the way to have a civil discussion like a reasonable, responsible, mature adult who has math and logic on their side and is therefore capable of supporting their stance/positions/claims with relevant factual data/evidence, hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Now that DSM has woken up anyone want to take bets what page we’ll be on by the time he goes to sleep again?

I think it’ll be ballpark of 340 at this rate. Maybe higher? What shall we celebrate page 400 with? I’m still thinking GiFs of The Office.

DSM has said nothing “new” in about 250 pages at this point. Minor tweaks? Sure. But nothing new other than having a pocket cleric around page 224 or so.

Anytime confronted with something that would change the mine of a sane person, his tactics are:

1) ignore it
2) redirect and distract
3) move the goalpost
4) or get the thread all in an unrelated tangent discussion ala #pocketCleric #warriorsSoloBetterthanEnchanters

Well said! Whatever page # is reached, I will be here attempting to continue to do my part contributing to the civil discussion.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by PlsNoBan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I guess one way to win arguments is refusing to give up and being so annoyingly obtuse that everyone else gives up talking to you. Not my preferred strategy but it's effective if you're willing to post complete bullshit over 1000 times like a psychopath

This is your strategy. The hundreds of troll/insult/meme posts prove this.

I will admit I am wrong if you can provide evidence to back up your claims.

You do not get to win a debate by trolling and simply dismissing anything that disagrees with you.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is your strategy. The hundreds of troll/insult/meme posts prove this.

The above Quote is simply an example of you sharing your opinion of what another's strategy is and what constitutes as "proof"; which are simply your opinions.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will admit I am wrong if you can provide evidence to back up your claims.

The problem is that your post does not seem to identify any particular claims which (based on the above Quote) apparently in your opinion - which is, again, simply your opinion - require additional evidence provided (for some unspecified reason that you simply did not specify).

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You do not get to win a debate by trolling and simply dismissing anything that disagrees with you.

You have not provided the definition you are using for "win" or "troll"/"trolling". The above Quote is simply an example of you sharing your opinion of whether another poster "gets to win" (whatever that means - as, again - you have not provided the definition you are using for "win").

[Troxx]

Now that DSM has woken up anyone want to take bets what page we’ll be on by the time he goes to sleep again?

I think it’ll be ballpark of 340 at this rate. Maybe higher? What shall we celebrate page 400 with? I’m still thinking GiFs of The Office.

DSM has said nothing “new” in about 250 pages at this point. Minor tweaks? Sure. But nothing new other than having a pocket cleric around page 224 or so.

Anytime confronted with something that would change the mine of a sane person, his tactics are:

1) ignore it
2) redirect and distract
3) move the goalpost
4) or get the thread all in an unrelated tangent discussion ala #pocketCleric #warriorsSoloBetterthanEnchanters