Probably time for a Kyle Rittenhouse thread.

[Whale biologist]

Originally Posted by starkind [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/sta...utes/941/iv/30

better than that NYTIMES link

this is definately a new one to me lol

941.34  Fluoroscopic shoe-fitting machines. Whoever uses, or possesses or controls with intent to so use, any fluoroscopic or X-ray machine for the purpose of shoe-fitting or attempting to fit shoes, or who knowingly permits such machine, whether in use or not, to remain on his or her premises, is subject to a Class B forfeiture. Each day of such use, possession or control shall constitute a separate violation of this section.
History: 1977 c. 173.

Goddam it lady not everything has to be about shoes! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Judge Dismisses Count Accusing Kyle Rittenhouse of Violating Curfew

Yep, Bias judge is bias.

It’s amazing we have preteens charged with murder in Pennsylvania when it was a cop that killed a child but a 17-year-old kid with a gun that’s not his can go vigilante in WI and kill two and wound another.

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Whale biologist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Goddam it lady not everything has to be about shoes! [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

ladies don't need no flouroscope we just shove them lil toes in there and cope [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Elizondo]

If Kyle is found not guilty Botten gonna need a comfort dog

[starkind]

i don't know why i even need to say this AND it is no justification for what happened however

Common sense dictates that if you see people marching down your street with AK 47's or AR 15's or whatever you don't go out and:

Confront them.
Argue with them.
Threaten them.
Aggress them in any way.
Throw stuff at them.
Yell at them.

first of all and foremost, why would you give your position away to a potential hostile?
second of all why don't you have claymores in your yard behind your holloween decorations
3rd and lastly if your going to fight with someone expect to die, and kill them first

I don't think violence was appropriate from any angle in this situation people are fucking stupid animals though and they are behaving like stupid animals

what neighboord was rosenbaum from and from how many miles away was he protesting in other peoples back yards? I'm only asking because I want to know how ate the fuck up the situation was, a lot like when protesters are driven in on busses from cities far away to instigate violence.

Wasn't Kyle was within walking distance from his home though? that was his neighboorhood, city, regardless of how stupid the cities soveriengty lines were? ---- AND THROUGHOUT the day he was working with law enforcement, firemen etc.

Again it's an ate up situation and americans have lost the idea of what it is to protest they don't know what a protest is anymore. Protesting is lobby fueled and transported apes and fundamentalists on a rampage these days.

[Ooloo]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yep, Bias judge is bias.

It’s amazing we have preteens charged with murder in Pennsylvania when it was a cop that killed a child but a 17-year-old kid with a gun that’s not his can go vigilante in WI and kill two and wound another.

Bias judge is based af. He's not having any bullshit.

You're not "going vigilante" just by carrying a gun, he was putting out fires and cleaning grafitti. He had the gun for personal protection, and it's a good thing he did isn't it?? Turns out he needed it. He works in kenosha and his father lives there, so he does have a personal stake in it.

He wasn't going on some kind of racist shooting spree, which is how he's been painted by the media outlets you undoubtedly guzzle like maple syrup. He shot people who were attacking him and threatening him. Pure self defense, case closed.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bias judge is based af. He's not having any bullshit.

You're not "going vigilante" just by carrying a gun, he was putting out fires and cleaning grafitti. He had the gun for personal protection, and it's a good thing he did isn't it?? Turns out he needed it. He works in kenosha and his father lives there, so he does have a personal stake in it.

He wasn't going on some kind of racist shooting spree, which is how he's been painted by the media outlets you undoubtedly guzzle like maple syrup. He shot people who were attacking him and threatening him. Pure self defense, case closed.

The dudes he shot were all white and one of them was a pederast

8 Year olds dude

[starkind]

Rosenbaum was a transient from texas who probably didn't even have a legal license and registration yet...? suprising.

That was 5 minutes of google i really don't feel like I need to do more.

What a great loss to society.

I would have felt threatend for my life just seeing him probably.

Find a new martyr.

[unsunghero]

There’s a lot more room to argue because Kyle’s actions to decide to put out fires and help people were good, his choice of setting to do them in was not so good

But when we consider self defense, it is possible to legally defend oneself with a gun and still be in the wrong, here’s an example:

I have a gun, I see another guy and decide to antagonize the living shit out of him verbally. I call him a bitch, a piece of shit, any insult I can think of based on his appearance or otherwise

He eventually gets pissed, picks up a rock, says “now you done it, I’m gonna beat the shit outta you”. As he gets close I open fire killing him


In this situation both people are in the wrong. The other person should have let the insults go, words are just words. And the person with a gun is in the wrong for provoking an innocent person into getting himself killed

Does this mean that the self-defense claim should be thrown out? Not sure what happens legally there, but both parties are in the wrong in that scenario

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Bias judge is based af. He's not having any bullshit.

You're not "going vigilante" just by carrying a gun, he was putting out fires and cleaning grafitti. He had the gun for personal protection, and it's a good thing he did isn't it?? Turns out he needed it. He works in kenosha and his father lives there, so he does have a personal stake in it.

He wasn't going on some kind of racist shooting spree, which is how he's been painted by the media outlets you undoubtedly guzzle like maple syrup. He shot people who were attacking him and threatening him. Pure self defense, case closed.

The judge is bias you can trip and fall on how many media sources are reporting the numerous mentions I have already shared in this thread.

LoL you fell for that garbage Kyle stated that his father lived in Kenosha? The defense attorneys knew Kyle could mention anything and his family as a minor could not be investigated by the prosecution.

Michael Rittenhouse; Kyle Rittenhouse's father certainly does not live or work in Kenosha. In fact he traveled there once or twice renting a room for clientele he entertained. In all accounts Michael Rittenhouse works in IL for an accounting firm and is a registered voter of IL.

Kyle Rittenhouse had no business being down in Kenosha and his social media which was not allowed as evidence showed his INTENT on what he wanted to do to others down there. Kyle very much played vigilante.

Sorry you felt the need to point out the type of people he killed and whether you felt it was relevant whether he was called a racist or not. Baler seek help.