Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Rants and Flames

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #251  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:22 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Being able to get informed does not indicate bias.

Please show how TMO is pulling PD or any VP Dragon onto ledges, and then fighting them in walls. Once you do that you can demonstrate how our cases are alike.
Why would fighting in a wall matter anymore with VP being outdoors? Seems like an idiot idea actually. Could cause all kinds of LOS problems for melee/casters, with zero benefit. Unless you wanted to corner pin him, which is a super common classic feature.

Oh and YOU PULLED DRAGONS TO THE LEDGE FOR WEEKS before the ruling was put into place. VP has rules when it benefits you, and has zero rules when it does not. Keep spinning on the meat pole.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #252  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:24 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
GM's also realize pathing in VP is fucked.... which is why they specifically pointed out that the ledges are off limits.

Also, you have still failed to show TMO fighting a VP dragon in a wall.

Keep spinning bro.


The pull itself should be off limits if its an exploit in itself. And pathing exploits are exploits by definition. People used to get banned for city of mist pathing exploits as well. IIRC the only way to get PD to path properly is to babysit him all the way down.

Good luck with that.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #253  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:31 PM
Safon Safon is offline
Fire Giant


Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 856
Default

Bloody hell...was the cheater admitted to Forceful Entry or not
  #254  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:34 PM
Kieu Kieu is offline
Kobold

Kieu's Avatar

Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
trivializing raid content.
  #255  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:34 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Safon [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Bloody hell...was the cheater admitted to Forceful Entry or not
outlook unclear
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #256  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:43 PM
Alarti0001 Alarti0001 is offline
Planar Protector

Alarti0001's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,500
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Why would fighting in a wall matter anymore with VP being outdoors? Seems like an idiot idea actually. Could cause all kinds of LOS problems for melee/casters, with zero benefit. Unless you wanted to corner pin him, which is a super common classic feature.

Oh and YOU PULLED DRAGONS TO THE LEDGE FOR WEEKS before the ruling was put into place. VP has rules when it benefits you, and has zero rules when it does not. Keep spinning on the meat pole.
Quote:
Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
The pull itself should be off limits if its an exploit in itself. And pathing exploits are exploits by definition. People used to get banned for city of mist pathing exploits as well. IIRC the only way to get PD to path properly is to babysit him all the way down.

Good luck with that.
Dragons being stuck and walls can cause issues with its AoE which has been demonstrated multiple times, with multiple dragons, in multiple zones including VP.

Yes we did pull dragons to the ledge... until a rule was made saying we can't.
The difference here is TMO follows the rules. FE members say well fuck that rule TMO did it once....

These are the rules brah. Stop dodging them
__________________
Irony
Quote:
Originally Posted by Samoht View Post
It's pretty clear he's become one of the people he described as No-life Nerds and Server Bullies.
  #257  
Old 04-18-2013, 12:59 PM
radditsu radditsu is offline
Planar Protector

radditsu's Avatar

Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,351
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alarti0001 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dragons being stuck and walls can cause issues with its AoE which has been demonstrated multiple times, with multiple dragons, in multiple zones including VP.

Yes we did pull dragons to the ledge... until a rule was made saying we can't.
The difference here is TMO follows the rules. FE members say well fuck that rule TMO did it once....

These are the rules brah. Stop dodging them
Nobody is dodging anything. My point is that pulling any dragon beyond his door and having him glitch anywhere, by letter of the law, is exploiting due to repeatable and relied upon pathing errors. Due to this, you have been cheating in VP since it opened. FE has been as well. Your guild has continually used these exploits in this zone to grief (Nexona? going over the world for example)

If there are no rules in VP this is not an issue. If rules by previous GM's are not in place then killing on the ledge is not an exploit. Which the rule was put in place when it was an indoor zone and ae's could be blocked. Vox and Nagafen are indoors. Trak is Indoors.

IF you want to prove to me that AE's in outdoor zones can be glitched.. put sev or tal in a wall. Otherwise you have no PROOF that it does anything but harm a raid engage.

Either way if VP is lawless, then it should be lawless. If VP has rules, then it should have uniform rules, not subject to YOUR interpretation, which is biased.
__________________

Tanrin,Rinat,Sprucewaynee
  #258  
Old 04-18-2013, 01:05 PM
47shadesofgay 47shadesofgay is offline
Banned


Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 48
Default

Why you guys arguing about this ledge thing?

Didn't FE wipe anyway? who cares lolo
  #259  
Old 04-18-2013, 01:06 PM
quido quido is offline
Planar Protector

quido's Avatar

Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,519
Default

durrrr
__________________
Jack <Yael Graduates> - Server First Erudite
Bush <Toxic>
Jeremy <TMO> - Patron Saint of Blue
  #260  
Old 04-18-2013, 01:16 PM
Versus Versus is offline
Planar Protector

Versus's Avatar

Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 1,339
Send a message via AIM to Versus
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by radditsu [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Either way if VP is lawless, then it should be lawless. If VP has rules, then it should have uniform rules, not subject to YOUR interpretation, which is biased.
I completely agree with you. Except that it is NOT lawless. Call it what you want but for a Non-CSR zone, many rules were made for it. Those rules were made to be followed or else you face a raid suspension. FE knew about the rules but pulled PD to a ledge regardless and undoubtedly figured they would just play dumb/say it was on old rule and it gave no advantage anymore. Bottom line is that you purposefully disobeyed a GM stated VP rule. If TMO did this, you would be bellyaching so hard it would be ridiculous and we would likely face a raid suspension.
__________________
Formerly: Phisting Uranus/Violently/Mcbard/Xosire
Phisting Furiously 60 Grandmaster <The Mystical Order>

Kolored on Red.

Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:37 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.