ELON MUSK vs. MARK ZUCKERBERG CAGE MATCH

[Homesteaded]

AP unbiased he says.

Your entire argument is hinged on the idea that ideas need to be controlled. You keep going back to that and it's ultimately why you are wrong.

Controlling ideas is bad, bad ideas will stand on merit or they won't. How on earth would you propose anyone controlling acceptable speech?

Group X: This speech actually causes me harm. It must be stopped.
Group Y: I'm sorry my opinion bothers you.
Group X: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No guy. You are an extreme lefty idiot. Which means my liberalism is to the right of you. Doesn't make me a right winger. I have talked shit about MAGA.

You appear to suck at understanding political spectrums.

Puppy dogs and candy canes.

You got outed. Way to lash out.

[Seducio]

Read On Liberty. The fact that you don't know what that means says something about your intelligence and education level. As in it's lacking.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you attack On Liberty then you are revealing a wicked belief system that deserves to get attacked by a liberal such as myself.

old school liberal Bill Maher (who is now by any definition a centrist) said it best, "I didn't change, the democratic party changed"

the modern leftist movement is so far gone to the left, that anything even slightly to the right, even centrist opinions are considered alt-right

these are the approximate circumstances that appeared during Weimar Germany, before the national socialist worker's party came to power.

once aaagain for the libtards, the nazi's were the leftist party, Fascism doesn't know political affiliation, it only knows how to stomp on liberties.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Homesteaded [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

AP unbiased he says.

Your entire argument is hinged on the idea that ideas need to be controlled. You keep going back to that and it's ultimately why you are wrong.

Controlling ideas is bad, bad ideas will stand on merit or they won't. How on earth would you propose anyone controlling acceptable speech?

Group X: This speech actually causes me harm. It must be stopped.
Group Y: I'm sorry my opinion bothers you.
Group X: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Propaganda is still propaganda. Sorry you don't like collectively agreed upon unbiased news agencies.

Guess doesn't help your X contributors pushing their soapbox short phrase and extreme hate interpreted memes.

meh

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by Homesteaded [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

AP unbiased he says.

Your entire argument is hinged on the idea that ideas need to be controlled. You keep going back to that and it's ultimately why you are wrong.

Controlling ideas is bad, bad ideas will stand on merit or they won't. How on earth would you propose anyone controlling acceptable speech?

Group X: This speech actually causes me harm. It must be stopped.
Group Y: I'm sorry my opinion bothers you.
Group X: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Don't expect to reason with a far lefty. If you want to understand where this belief is coming from read Repressive Tolerance by Herbert Marcuse. This basically gives extreme lefties permission to say that they believe anything 'resembling' right-wing speech or having right-wing outcomes is allowed to be suppressed.

They actually believe that shit.

It's actually a European idea that has been adopted by far lefty Americans which is in opposition to the universal American value of the 1st Amendments Freedom of Speech that 100% of Americans enjoy.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Seducio [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Read On Liberty. The fact that you don't know what that means says something about your intelligence and education level. As in it's lacking.

The irony...

The fact your book is now no longer a valid depiction of truth on the matter... makes you fit your insults.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The irony...

The fact your book is now no longer a valid depiction of truth on the matter... makes you fit your insults.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

No it means you haven't read it.

[Trexller]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The irony...

The fact your book is now no longer a valid depiction of truth on the matter... makes you fit your insults.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

the fact that you think you're being insulted speaks massive volumes with regard to your tenuous understanding of modern american political discourse

[Seducio]

Originally Posted by Botten [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The irony...

The fact your book is now no longer a valid depiction of truth on the matter... makes you fit your insults.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You don't believe in Peace. You want Free Palestine and as such have yet to say what Hamas did on Oct 7 is wrong. It's clear you are full of shit and you aren't intelligent enough or wise enough to see the depraved anti-semitic extreme fringe ideology that you champion.