Project 1999

Go Back   Project 1999 > General Community > Off Topic

View Poll Results: Do you live in one of America's inner cities?
Yes, I live in a but I got inner city 41 18.55%
Yes, I live in a crime infested inner city 35 15.84%
Yes, I live in a burning crime infested inner city 33 14.93%
Bush burned the crime infested towers 153 69.23%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 221. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #24231  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:14 PM
Irulan Irulan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,083
Default

Joe should just run as a republican.
  #24232  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:16 PM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Joe should just run as a republican.
Right!? Drop the two-party veil entirely. (this is why "Orange Man, Bad", btw. Outsiders aren't welcome, and they sure as fuck aren't supposed to win and start trying to do things to help actual Americans.)
Last edited by Throndor; 01-07-2019 at 05:21 PM..
  #24233  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:22 PM
Irulan Irulan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Right!? Drop the two-party veil entirely. (this is why "Orange Man, Bad", btw. Outsiders aren't welcome, and they sure as fuck aren't supposed to win and start trying to do things to help actual Americans.)
Joe will probably lose no matter what. I wouldn't worry much about him.
  #24234  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:24 PM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Joe will probably lose no matter what.
I fuckin' hope so. I hope we see a never-ending stream of organic candidates entering into public office and ousting establishment shills on both imaginary "sides". I don't even care which ticket they run under, as long as they're intelligent enough to have actual DETAILED solutions instead of cheap ass rhetoric coupled with a crippling bait and switch policy.

Tire of crooked politicians pissing down our backs and telling us it's raining.
  #24235  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:27 PM
JurisDictum JurisDictum is offline
Banned


Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 2,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
"uniquely"? hahahahahahahahaha

hahahaha....the Bush's don't have political "Pull"?! HAHAHAHAHAHA! You're fucking hilarious. C'mon man, stop. Next thing you're going to tell me, is that the Kennedy's don't have "pull", or the Rothschilds.....hahahahaha

We're talking about families with legacies that extend back to the founding of the country; often including roots in English Aristocracy and global finance: and what kind kind of shit are you on....!?

You know, people that that racist shitlord Jackson warned us about when he bought us back out of debt-slavery. Ur fucking funny, bro.
Well maybe you can compare Clinton to Kennedy (Kennedy had even more pull). But really what she was like is Nixon with a partner that was once a popular president.

In genreal -- families are powerful including political ones. I get what your saying. What I'm saying is that's not what it used to be in general -- evidenced by Bush's loss....not just loss but spectacular loss. His political life is over.

It really didn't happen that way for hillary though. What happened with Hillary was not that Trump pointed out she was a tool for the establishment and lost all credibility (like Jeb).

What happened with hillary is she lost. After all the inevitability horseshit 2 elections in a row (discluding obama's re-run). It just destroyed her reputation as a power player. She has some clout still...but mostly its fading fast.

Then all the stuff about DNC rigging against Bernie came out...then the stuff about pad piper strategy -- she actually directed the media companies she was in good with (most of them except fox) to cover trump and try to get trump to win the election because she thought she could win.

It just really sank home for anyone disappointed with the luke warm Dem establishment -- that it was all fixed planned and corrupted from the beginning. This isn't about compromising to appeal to more americans, this is about our politicans compromising with corporations so they could push out the politicians that are not corrupted by their influence.

In short, your kind of applying a general historical rule (powerful political families often win elections) to an election that's probably not lining up to be typical (2020).

This is the same mistake people that predicted Romneys win and Trumps loss had...things aren't business as usual in politics lately.

Regardless. The fact was Clinton WAS the DNC. She completly ran that organization in a way biden does not. There was much more democratic unity on the onset of 2016 then there will be in 2020 as well.
  #24236  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:29 PM
ScaringChildren ScaringChildren is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,180
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Joe will probably lose no matter what. I wouldn't worry much about him.
Since you're back....thoughts?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
  #24237  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:33 PM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JurisDictum [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Well maybe you can compare Clinton to Kennedy (Kennedy had even more pull). But really what she was like is Nixon with a partner that was once a popular president.

In genreal -- families are powerful including political ones. I get what your saying. What I'm saying is that's not what it used to be in general -- evidenced by Bush's loss....not just loss but spectacular loss. His political life is over.
That was us. Do you realize how much of Trump's Trumpisms come from his support base, first? Do you think Trump would have been as successful as he was if we weren't feeding him the right way to attack these shills, while simultaneously creating a support platform that CHEERS HIM ON when he says these things?

At the GOP debates, we literally booed the man (Jeb) offstage every time he attempted to stand up there and spout off about irrelevant establishment shill bullshit. You're damned right Jeb Bush's political career is over. WE ENDED IT. We took our fucking party back from the uni-party retards hellbent on destroying this country, and we will continue to do so until every single one of them realign their allegiances or slink back into the swamp without an elected position. They're either going to get in line, and start serving their constituency, or their career is over. I suggest you make the same demands of your side of the aisle.

Once we've finally cleaned up the outward face of this fucking swamp, then we can get to work removing them from the underbelly that they go slinking back into when their public lives are ruined. Until then, enjoy the show.

No one owes that treasonous cunt (HC), shit.
Last edited by Throndor; 01-07-2019 at 05:41 PM..
  #24238  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:41 PM
Irulan Irulan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Throndor [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
That was us. Do you realize how much of Trump's Trumpisms come from his support base, first? Do you think Trump would have been as successful as he was if we weren't feeding him the right way to attack these shills, while simultaneously creating a support platform that CHEERS HIM ON when he says these things?

At the GOP debates, we literally booed the man (Jeb) offstage every time he attempted to stand up there and spout off about irrelevant establishment shill bullshit. You're damned right Jeb Bush's political career is over. WE ENDED IT. We took our fucking party back from the uni-party retards hellbent on destroying this country, and we will continue to do so until every single one of them realign their allegiances. They're either going to get in line, and start serving their constituency, or their career is over. I suggest you make the same demands of your side of the aisle.

No one owes that treasonous cunt (HC), shit.
Dems need to do this but they are literally scared of losing / sheep. (being alienated from the kiddy table where they are handing out free gifts).
Last edited by Irulan; 01-07-2019 at 05:44 PM..
  #24239  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:43 PM
Irulan Irulan is offline
Banned


Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 2,083
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ScaringChildren [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Since you're back....thoughts?

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
3/10 needs moar thicker load running down contour of chin.

I am flattered though [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Will probably make more pics to celebrity fake.
  #24240  
Old 01-07-2019, 05:47 PM
Throndor Throndor is offline
Banned


Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 1,277
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Irulan [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
Dems need to do this but they are literally scared of losing / sheep. (being alienated from the kiddy table where they are handing out free gifts).
Of course they are. Why do you think I've repeatedly characterized the leftists on this thread as children for the past 400 pages? They have the mindset of a child. Gullible. Malleable. Programmable.

They're literally defending the establishment now. How the fuck did the left become establishmentarians!?!?!? It's sheer lunacy!

Learn how to defend against persuassive rhetoric. Be mindful of wolves in sheep's clothing promising you everything under the sun (at someone else's expense). This is all day 1 shit. Check this out:


Obdurate

Definition: stubbornly refusing to change one's opinion or course of action.

Original Definition now detailed as a tertiary definition in today's world of charlatans and political crooks: resistant to persuasion or softening influences

Secondary Definition: hardened in feelings

In a world where snake oil salesmen and communists have infiltrated our public institutions, having in-built resistance to their silver-tongued rhetoric is a bad thing. The left cannot win arguments with logic (they aren't even willing to provide DETAILED solutions that can be analyzed by the objective observer), so they resort to pathos (feels bad stories) They want you stupid and gullible or your an uncaring beast of a human. This is how they dehumanize all of their opposition. This is why, even when i tell you true stories about my life that are poignantly charged with strong emotions, you reject them, deny their truth, and viciously attack without the EMPATHY YOU CLAIM TO POSSESS.

Dont agree with me?! You're a Racist, homophobic, maniac who likes to kill children! (nevermind how "we" support the ACTUAL KILLING OF CHILDREN in the womb)
Last edited by Throndor; 01-07-2019 at 05:57 PM..
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:30 AM.


Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Project 1999 is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.