Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just do not have any rebuttals to any of his posts. They are generally spot on.

Looks like what I said came true already:

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You will probably start engaging with him now just to try and disprove this point, but the post history is clear. The VAST majority of his posts have been ignored by every single poster in this thread.

You can look back at the post history and see that everybody (including yourself) is ignoring him. This is a very poor attempt to try and paint him as not a troll. If it was just me trying to avoid his points, wouldn't you see a bunch of other people engaging with him? I tried to engage with him when he started posting, but he has shown himself to be a troll fairly early on.

You have reached a new level of desperation by trying to pretend you weren't ignoring him, along with all the other posters. When you can't win with facts and logic, you just double down on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argumentum_ad_populum .

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Looks like what I said came true already:

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You will probably start engaging with him now just to try and disprove this point, but the post history is clear. The VAST majority of his posts have been ignored by every single poster in this thread.

The problem is that your post would seem to indicate that you believe it is somehow relevant how many other posters reply to me, when the VAST majority of my posts have been directed to you - and not any other particular single poster in this thread - hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You can look back at the post history and see that everybody (including yourself) is ignoring him.

This is - objectively - false. Even you have - very selectively - replied to some of my earlier posts, as you (yourself) have admitted hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

This is a very poor attempt to try and paint him as not a troll.

Why does your post seem to imply that you believe that I am or should be "painted" as any particular thing? If I am a troll, you should be able to provide evidence that supports/proves it, however, you have not provided - and seemingly cannot provide - evidence to support your repeated (unsubstantiated & false) claims.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If it was just me trying to avoid his points, wouldn't you see a bunch of other people engaging with him?

The problem is your post seems to (attempt to) dismiss/disregard the relevant/pertinent fact that the VAST majority of my posts have been directed toward you, specifically & exclusively. You have provided no reasoning or logic as to how that has any relation, relevance or bearing on why you (specifically & exclusively) are (seemingly) unwilling to engage with me in a civil discussion.

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I tried to engage with him when he started posting, but he has shown himself to be a troll fairly early on.

Again, as I have stated to you multiple times, you have provided zero evidence that supports your claim that I have "shown myself to be a troll". This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Kich867]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just do not have any rebuttals to any of his posts. They are generally spot on.

C'mon, there's no way you even read them haha. The dude uses sub-parenthesis and has copy-pasted the same thing for like 150 pages, there's really not a lot of content in them to even agree or disagree with, way too strong of magnetaress vibes or whatever their name is.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by Kich867 [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

C'mon, there's no way you even read them haha. The dude uses sub-parenthesis and has copy-pasted the same thing for like 150 pages, there's really not a lot of content in them to even agree or disagree with, way too strong of magnetaress vibes or whatever their name is.

It’s mostly copy paste … a mirroring of tactic DSM has been using. I just scan them for new stuff.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

It’s mostly copy paste … a mirroring of tactic DSM has been using. I just scan them for new stuff.

The difference is he is copy/pasting nonsense, and I am copy pasting the actual math/data that has been accumulated thus far.

You yourself are just copy/pasting insults and memes lol. I am not sure why you think you are any better than him.

Your refusal to believe basic math and data does not mean the posts are the same. I will not allow the trolls to drown out the facts simply because they don't like them.

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The difference is he is copy/pasting nonsense, and I am copy pasting the actual math/data that has been accumulated thus far.

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The difference is he is copy/pasting nonsense, and I am copy pasting the actual math/data that has been accumulated thus far.

For the sake of civil discussion, what definition of "nonsense" are you using?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You yourself are just copy/pasting insults and memes lol.

For the sake of civil discussion, what definition of "insult" and "meme" are you using?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I am not sure why you think you are any better than him.

I am not sure why your post would seem to indicate/reveal/betray that you (seemingly) believe that you are aware of what others think, or why your post would seem to imply that there is any merit or relevance whether a particular poster is "any better than" another particular poster (or what that even means, as you have provided no definition[s]).

For the sake of civil discussion, what definition of "better" are you using?

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Your refusal to believe basic math and data does not mean the posts are the same.

You have provided zero evidence to support your apparent claim that "refusal to believe basic math and data does not mean the posts are the same" (whatever that is supposed to mean).

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I will not allow the trolls to drown out the facts simply because they don't like them.

For the sake of civil discussion, what definition of "trolls" are you using?

Hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Karanis]

Let's all just quote cyxthryth's posts only, that way DSM can either hilariously attempt to respond to him, talk to himself, or stop posting entirely!

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Reposting the current state of the discussion:



DSM attempted to move the goalposts by bringing a 5th "pocket" character into his "arguments" (even though this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument) pertaining to the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" discussion.

Of course - speaking strictly mathematically - 4=/=5, so it is unclear why DSM has attempted to bring this 5th character into the equation or why his posts would seem to indicate that believes doing so is not an example of him moving goalposts - when it objectively is - hehe.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Karanis [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Let's all just quote cyxthryth's posts only, that way DSM can either hilariously attempt to respond to him, talk to himself, or stop posting entirely!

This won't hurt me. Trolling more just makes you look like... a troll. Great way to try and show your points are valid, and not just trolling[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] Please do this.

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Yup, you go back to trolling when you can't disprove my point. I predict another nonsense post from cyxthryth ahead.