Best 4 person all caster/priest group

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

QUIT TALKING ABOUT POCKET CHARACTERS!

The point is that pocket characters are not a part of this discussion. I am, however, loving the mental gymnastics requires to rationalize adding the shaman … because your argument obligates this group has to bring the class it really needed/wanted as a log in bot.

Not at all. A Shaman/Necro/Mage/Enchanter group would work 100% fine without a pocket cleric. They have all the healing they need. It is why a Shaman/Enchanter/Monk trio works. They have the healing.

I am simply pointing out you CAN add a pocket cleric to any group composition if you wish, which is a common thing among experienced players.

I don't know where people thought I said a Shaman/Necro/Mage/Enchanter requires a pocket cleric to work. They have healing and res already, and a Shaman can primary heal just fine with Torpor.

I don't know how people can say an Enchanter/Shaman/Monk trio has enough heals to operate efficiently, but when you add another member that suddenly vanishes.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Yes it would work fine. But it would not work better than a cleric 2 chanters and literally any other warm-body mouth breathing druid or wizard (worst options for 4th spot)

More tangents time?

[DeathsSilkyMist]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Yes it would work fine. But it would not work better than a cleric 2 chanters and literally any other warm-body mouth breathing druid or wizard (worst options for 4th spot)

You have yet to prove that, and the DPS breakpoints show otherwise. You can hit the DPS breakpoints just fine with a Necro/Shaman/Enchanter/Mage, while having all of the healing/resing/utility necessary to efficiently camp anything a four man group could do.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by DeathsSilkyMist [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have yet to prove

You have yet to prove your much-repeated and - objectively - false claims that I am a troll / that I am trolling / that all of my posts are copy/pastes of "silly" "nonsense". This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

You have yet to prove your much-repeated and - objectively - false claims that I am a troll / that I am trolling / that all of my posts are copy/pastes of "silly" "nonsense". This really isn't hard hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He ain’t gonna reply to you man. Why is it only you he chooses to ignore? I dunno but it’s pretty damn funny. He’ll reply to my random GiFs but not you.

[Crede]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He ain’t gonna reply to you man. Why is it only you he chooses to ignore? I dunno but it’s pretty damn funny. He’ll reply to my random GiFs but not you.

I concur, reading cyxthryth's posts and watching DSM blatantly ignore them has brought me the most enjoyment in this thread. This is due to the fact that everything he says are objective truths, whereas everything DSM says is an opinion, so there's really no way for DSM to refute anything he says. Cyxthryth's is just playing this forum logic chess game better than DSM. I think we should all stop responding so they can actually attempt to have a civil discussion, since DSM's constant ignores have forced him to go strictly into quoting mode.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

DSM attempted to move the goalposts by bringing a 5th "pocket" character into his "arguments" (even though this is intended to be a civil discussion - not an argument) pertaining to the "Best 4 person all caster/priest group" discussion.

Of course - speaking strictly mathematically - 4=/=5, so it is unclear why DSM has attempted to bring this 5th character into the equation or why his posts would seem to indicate that believes doing so is not an example of him moving goalposts - when it objectively is - hehe.

Originally Posted by cyxthryth [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The problem is that your post would seem to indicate that you believe that your opinion of what is significant - such as a difference in kill time of 4.3 seconds per mob - is objective; it is not - it is simply your opinion hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] This really isn't hard.

[Troxx]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[Troxx]

I just do not have any rebuttals to any of his posts. They are generally spot on.

[cyxthryth]

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

I just do not have any rebuttals to any of his posts. They are generally spot on.

Thanks for the support!

Originally Posted by Troxx [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

He ain’t gonna reply to you man. Why is it only you he chooses to ignore? I dunno but it’s pretty damn funny. He’ll reply to my random GiFs but not you.

I am not sure, but maybe/perhaps/possibly it's because he has no rebuttals to my posts either hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.] I mean, if he had any, he could simply provide the relevant data/evidence that supports his position/claims/"arguments" hehe. [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]