![]() |
#2381
|
|||
|
![]() She will never post any, she will get tied up trying to tank mystical dragons drunk.
| ||
#2382
|
|||
|
![]() oh no
| ||
#2383
|
|||
|
![]() | ||
#2384
|
||||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
To accommodate said break, I will not be posting again until someone can do the following: 1. Show my data is invalid. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9-g8Ywibztg , https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5XwiGKTuu2E , and the math provided here: https://www.project1999.com/forums/s...postcount=1774 2. Provide DPS data for Mages that is different enough from Troxx's. 3. Show why saving 5 seconds on a kill is going to help the group in a meaningful way. None of these points have happened in this bloated thread, regardless of how many times the trolls will claim they have. Everybody has agreed the fourth player's DPS is irrelevant in an Enchanter/Enchanter/Cleric/<insert class> group. This is what I said on Page 2: Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
As I summarized before, the question is simply do you want a faster leveling experience from 1-60 (Mage), or better ability to do camps at level 60 (Shaman)? I prefer the Shaman, because leveling from 1-60 with a four caster group is going to be fast enough. The Mage simply doesn't offer enough at the end, when people are farming items. The only exception to this is if you are planning on doing camps where CoTH can help. If this is the case though, you can still do Shaman/Enchanter/Necro/Mage for the maximum ability to do any camp you desire, while still DPSing fine. People think pocket clerics are silly for some reason, but it isn't hard to level a cleric to 49 for the 90% res and Complete Healing between four players. A pocket cleric would go great with the Shaman/Enchanter/Necro/Mage combo, as you can switch to it for reses and healing the pets with CH as necessary. Finally, the reason why DPS isn't as important as people claim is due to DPS breakpoints. Here is an example: If a group has 100 DPS, a mob with 8000 HP will die in 80 seconds. If a group has 200 DPS, a mob with 8000 HP will die in 40 seconds. If a group has 400 DPS, a mob with 8000 HP will die in 20 seconds. For most level 60 content in the game, 200 DPS is the ideal threshold. As you can see, going from 200 to 400 only gives you half the bonus (20 seconds vs. 40 seconds). You could reach 400 DPS if you did a group with 4x Enchanters, but everybody seems to agree that is too risky. The amount of time you save on kills isn't worth the added risk of dying. People already know that safety is better than DPS in this situation. A group with 2x Enchanters and a group with an Enchanter/Mage/Necro/Shaman will hit the 200 DPS threshold. Luckily it is not a tough threshold to hit. There will be a bunch of silly posts after this I predict.
__________________
| |||||||
Last edited by DeathsSilkyMist; 09-10-2022 at 10:18 AM..
|
#2385
|
|||
|
![]() Yes, we're all trolls. Every single one of us.
Keep telling yourself those lies -- maybe you'll stop hating yourself as much? | ||
#2386
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
#2387
|
|||||||
|
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I hope you take an indefinite break from this thread until people do whatever dumb shit you asked them to do. Nobody is ever gonna do it and they don't have to. You thoroughly lost the argument. We can all agree to be done here now. If someone posts asking about the best 4 man caster group for ixiblat then we can re-visit this issue.
__________________
1: Mage is a better group DPS class than Shaman
2: Enchanters solo better than Warriors These statements are not up for debate amongst sane human beings Why does <Vanquish> allow DSM to be a member? | ||||||
#2388
|
|||
|
![]() /g Combined: A rock golem in 925s, 167k @181 | Lasobn 50906@55 (55 in 923s) | Minweeni 37243@40 (40 in 921s) | Allisna 27601@30 (30 in 919s) | Drayce 27156@29 (29 in 924s) | Taringail 20656@22 (26 in 795s) | Jenartik 1366@1 (11 in 120s) | Lobn 926@1 (12 in 78s) | Jibarab 685@1 (6 in 122s) | Xendary 430@0 (1 in 340s) | Emmure 148@0 (0 in 321s)
Lasobn is my pet. /g Combined: An elemental warrior in 222s, 32863 @148 | Allisna 20280@91 (91 in 222s) | Xasanab 12583@57 (65 in 194s) /g Combined: A drolvarg bodyguard in 216s, 34323 @159 | Koner 11872@55 (56 in 211s) | Blanka 8811@41 (41 in 213s) | Smuggla 7796@36 (39 in 202s) | Allisna 5844@27 (28 in 210s) | Bluzkie 0@0 (0 in 0s) /g Decayed prisoner in 23s, 5025 @218 | Koner 1653@72 (87 in 19s) | Allisna 1333@58 (70 in 19s) | Smuggla 1022@44 (57 in 18s) | Blanka 1017@44 (44 in 23s) /g A drolvarg pawbuster in 43s, 7941 @185 | Koner 2484@58 (67 in 37s) | Blanka 2097@49 (49 in 43s) | Smuggla 1836@43 (51 in 36s) | Allisna 1524@35 (48 in 32s) /g Combined: Decayed soldier in 927s, 142k @153 | Allisna 38571@42 (46 in 843s) | Labaner 36852@40 (41 in 897s) | Vabarn 35988@39 (42 in 849s) | Neonne 26081@28 (31 in 853s) | Decayed soldier 3438@4 (4 in 855s) | Decayed prisoner 607@1 (14 in 44s) | Doomzday 0@0 (0 in 0s) | Reque 0@0 (0 in 0s) | Dybwin 0@0 (0 in 0s) /g Combined: A drolvarg bodyguard in 369s, 35262 @96 | Lobarer 17817@48 (49 in 367s) | Allisna 17445@47 (47 in 369s) /g Combined: A shard spider in 1187s, 189k @159 | Allisna 55757@47 (49 in 1143s) | Kabarn 51844@44 (52 in 992s) | Lasantik 36833@31 (31 in 1185s) | Banedeath 33443@28 (49 in 679s) | Garobtik 5999@5 (52 in 115s) | Kaytt 5187@4 (4 in 1184s) | Crankee 74@0 (1 in 120s) | Jimee 0@0 (0 in 0s) | Belshazar 0@0 (0 in 0s) | Triumphant 0@0 (0 in 0s) I can send you my log file if that helps too, ping me on discord /nod [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]
__________________
| ||
#2389
|
|||
|
![]() Thanks for the data! I'll get the logs from you a bit later today. Just looking at it here, the numbers are the same as Troxx's data. This was a level 60 water pet?
__________________
| ||
#2390
|
||||
|
![]() Quote:
| |||
![]() |
|
|