NY GRAND JURY VOTES TO INDICT TRUMP

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Hello, in case you cant figure it out. You are the wanker here. Doing stupid stuff to prove your stupidity.
Tell a priest he cant act on his message from god. I dare ya. And he can keep it secret, by confessing to another priest who is not compelled to report it in any way.
Telling a person he may not manifest his gods will will open all sorts of lawsuits i believe. Yas even have a specific amendment.
Australia is fucked in this as well. South Australia had a case where a bishop proved he was not compelled to punish a priest for doing what was between him and his god.
Good grief.
So no. I dont support child abuse in any way, shape or form.
But i will call out those that DONT call out our priestly fuckers for doing it behind closed doors and being able to say.
Immunity cuz god.
Hypo Fucking Crits.

You're so utterly clueless it's laughable

Child Sex Trafficking is an international business you wanker. This goes beyond abuse.

Just stop posting and making a fool out yourself

[Origen]

Elizondo, when was your last date?

[Duik]

Skurd of discourse?
So who does this worldwide ring? The priests? Hollywood. The reverse vampires, in association with the Rank corporation?
You're right. Im confused. Enlighten me oh font of conspiratorial knowledge.
I know, like some us states legislating that children can now work certain jobs. Its like an apprenticeship of sorts. Learn a saleable skill in the US and A then be worth more money on the inter-my-national child trafficking ring.
Bingo, we gots it worked out.

[Elizondo]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Skurd of discourse?
So who does this worldwide ring? The priests? Hollywood. The reverse vampires, in association with the Rank corporation?
You're right. Im confused. Enlighten me oh font of conspiratorial knowledge.
I know, like some us states legislating that children can now work certain jobs. Its like an apprenticeship of sorts. Learn a saleable skill in the US and A then be worth more money on the inter-my-national child trafficking ring.
Bingo, we gots it worked out.

https://apnews.com/article/day-care-...74f97502058fb1

Former state lawmaker charged with sexual exploitation of children

BOSTON (AP) — A former New Hampshire state lawmaker and the one-time partner of a woman charged with taking sexually explicit photos of children at the Massachusetts day care center where she worked has also been charged in the case, federal prosecutors said Tuesday.

Stacie Marie Laughton, 39, of Nashua, New Hampshire, is charged with aiding and abetting the sexual exploitation of children, the U.S. attorney’s office in Boston said in a statement.

typicaldem.jpg
knewit.jpg

Originally Posted by Origen [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Elizondo, when was your last date?

Low T Beta Feminist still raging

[unsunghero]

^
I’m assuming that person is trans. People low on the passable side kinda confuse me at first. But then I see the pic with the woman’s power business pantsuit down below

Hope I don’t get banned for calling someone bad at being passable…

[Duik]

Thats one example. And a fucked up one as well. Didnt read it but assume its a non priest, pastor or preacher. So, thats LeBad, agreed.

He does not belong to a club that protects fellow members from ramafications if he divulged his shitty predilection to a fellow worker though does he? Unless by coincidence he also is a dirty fucken pedo as well. But my point still stands.
Do you see where this is going now? Secret clubs that protect members are an EXCELLENT way to do shitty stuff in plain view.

The other side can put one example up as well.
Still no actual answer. Waste of time asking, but do you think the self protecting pedo club that is organized religion is in a perfect position to do said trafficking etc? From a logical point?

The fellow priests dont even need to agree with pedo priest. But they CANNOT allow the mystical power of the church to be diluted by the laws of us mere men.

Priests LeBad?
LeWorse because implied niceness, wholesomeness and built in protection?
Go.

[Duik]

Originally Posted by unsunghero [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

^
I’m assuming that person is trans. People low on the passable side kinda confuse me at first. But then I see the pic with the woman’s power business pantsuit down below

Hope I don’t get banned for calling someone bad at being passable…

Ha. I didnt notice. Its only insulting if you did it with provable malice.
You guys are waaay to uptight about this trans stuff.

If ya been a man till you make children, win a gold medal at the olympics and have had ya 40th birthday. You have more problems than being just trans.

Some non trans fully gender-as-visibly-born people also are confusing to look at. But dont hold that against me.
My nickname at work is Wonder Woman. One dude said he calls me that cuz he wondered if I was a woman or not. LMFAO. Bastard.

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by Duik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Ha. I didnt notice. Its only insulting if you did it with provable malice.
You guys are waaay to uptight about this trans stuff.

If ya been a man till you make children, win a gold medal at the olympics and have had ya 40th birthday. You have more problems than being just trans.

Some non trans fully gender-as-visibly-born people also are confusing to look at. But dont hold that against me.
My nickname at work is Wonder Woman. One dude said he calls me that cuz he wondered if I was a woman or not. LMFAO. Bastard.

Hey technically if it’s about equity I can be as hyper-critical about appearance as I am with everyone else [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

If you’re gonna be a woman, do it right. Gonna need to rock a wig, that hairline ain’t doing it. But hey I’m bald, so I’d have to wear a wig also. Thems the breaks

And some makeup wouldn’t hurt in this case imo

Edit: and I’m talkin about the person in the pic btw obv

[Duik]

Lmao unsung. Preconceived ideas much? I live with a woman who has never used makeup ever. Wore a dress just the once to her dads 2nd wedding. Used to have a blonde mohawk hairdo, naturally smaller boobs and was seen as either male or lesbian.
We both just lolocaust at other peoples idea of "what a woman should look like" we made 2 wonderful babies, so one of us is defo a woman. And it matters not who others think the woman is to be honest.
Just see a person not a gender and the rest takes care of itself.
People see me as effeminate. To those there is only one good answer. And ive had one great interaction with the following...
Put your wife in my bed for one night and she can tell you in the morning. The screaming was answered with well you called me a girl buddy boy so go fuck yourself. I kill me.
It's LePretty simples.
Se the Human. Not the man or the woman.
Requires suspending ones disbelief that we can just see the being and not the objectification of what one expects to see.

[Origen]

Originally Posted by Elizondo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Low T Beta Feminist still raging

Why are you avoiding this simple question? When's the last date you went on? You don't have to be specific