Probably time for a Kyle Rittenhouse thread.

[starkind]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

[You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

These people are insane and they aren't the alt right. Even.

[walfreyydo]

Still waiting for you right wingers to post where a Trump supporting politician, FOX news or OAN has outright condemned violence perpetuated by Trump supporters as opposed to enflaming it.

[walfreyydo]

Originally Posted by Jibartik [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Pelosi: "I Don't Even Know Why There Aren't Uprisings All Over The Country" Over Migrant Child Separation

watters "And if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd. And you push back on them. And you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere."

AOC 'US communities have no choice but to riot'

Rep. Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass "There needs to be unrest in the streets for as long as there’s unrest in our lives,"

Rep. Jerry Nadler says Antifa violence in Portland a 'myth'

CNN "Show me where protestors are supposed to be polite and peaceful"

MSNBC: "It is not generally speaking unruly, but fires have taken the police station."

Vice President Harris: On being asked about the 100 day long riots, "they're not going to give up nor should they"

https://nypost.com/2021/01/07/libera...summers-riots/

You are taking endorsements of protests and saying that its endorsing violence. You are taking quotes out of context.

Saying they have "no choice but to riot" isnt an endorsement. Its a recognition that people are upset.

Unrest != rioting

Anitfa violence in portland a myth - not sure how thats an endorsement and I have not seen proof that any violence was tied to antifa - (the point he was making).

"They are not going to give up nor should they" - speaking about the protests not the looting

All of the shit you posted is taken totally out of context (and you didnt provide sources).

[walfreyydo]

Then on the other hand you have Tuckers latest documentary which basically rewrites January 6th history and tries to push a phony wide-ranging conspiracy that these werent trump supporters.

[Jibartik]

sorry loose you tried and failed.

[Botten]

Originally Posted by Ooloo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

The judge is doing a pretty damn good job and showing an actual backbone considering he knows everyone will be calling for his head if kyle walks.

And anyway, none of those points you raised are relevant at all. The prosecution *STILL* had\has no case, at all. Kyle's actions represent CLEAR self defense, and the actions of the mob pursuing him represent a CLEAR threat to his life. Case closed, move on, he's not the white supremacist boogeyman you're looking for.

Schroeder again shows bias going into the next day of the trial.

The Judge denied the prosecution's line of questioning but allows the defense's.

“I have to say, your honor, yesterday, I was the target of your ire for disregarding your orders. Today the defense is disregarding your order,” Binger replied.

Schroeder cutting the prosecution off saying, “you know, I don’t want to talk about” it.

The right to a fair case is very relevant. This judge is getting in the way of that.

And other than your options you have yet to produce examples of otherwise. Often your posts go on hiatus stating the left is wrong with very bad or non-exist examples.

[Patriam1066]

Kyle went somewhere with a gun, LARP’ed being a bad ass. Got scared and killed someone

It doesn’t pass the common sense as self defense. Seems like a boy without a father who wanted to seem tough. 17 year olds don’t have a legal right to bear arms

[Patriam1066]

Someone prove that Kyle rittenhouse isn’t going to hell. You can’t

[unsunghero]

Originally Posted by walfreyydo [You must be logged in to view images. Log in or Register.]

Still waiting for you right wingers to post where a Trump supporting politician, FOX news or OAN has outright condemned violence perpetuated by Trump supporters as opposed to enflaming it.

I had to use DuckDuckGo to find it, since Google only wants to show me left wing propaganda

But ultimately it only still took a few seconds

“A slew of Republican leaders condemned the rioting that took place on Capitol Hill Wednesday, urging those on site not to engage in violence.”

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gop...n-end-to-riots

[unsunghero]

I mean, it makes sense for politicians to condemn riots, since the alternative, inciting a riot, is literally illegal:

“United States. ... Incitement to riot is illegal under U.S. federal law”

“In criminal law, incitement is the encouragement of another person to commit a crime. Depending on the jurisdiction, some or all types of incitement may be illegal. Where illegal, it is known as an inchoate offense, where harm is intended but may or may not have actually occurred”

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inci...#United_States